2. ARC-24-006 249 SEABREEZE AVE. The applicant, Joseph & Elizabeth Berger, has filed an application requesting Architectural Commission review and approval for new vehicular and pedestrian gates and modifications to previously approved landscape and hardscape, including driveway reductions and change in perimeter site walls as well as modifications to the previously approved design of the front door and balcony railings.
Received via email 3.25.24:
Dear Members of ARCOM,
We are writing to you in regard to the proposed plans for modification of 249 Seabreeze Avenue. We live across the street at 240 Seabreeze and have specific concerns about the proposed vehicular gate.
Our neighborhood is characterized by welcoming single-family homes. There are currently no driveway gates on our block of Seabreeze Avenue. We therefore feel that the proposed gate is NOT in harmony with properties in the general area.
If a vehicular gate is ultimately approved for 249 Seabreeze, we ask that special care be taken to ensure the gate’s motor is not audible from neighboring properties.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Jean and Robert Good 240 Seabreeze Avenue Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 3.26.24:
Dear Members of The Town of Palm Beach Architectural Review Commission Board,
We are the immediate west-adjacent neighbors
of 249 Seabreeze Avenue. We strongly oppose any further modifications to this property and urge you to DENY ALL REQUESTS.
We urge instead that the board examine the outstanding issues related to Permit A-23-02895, approved on March 29, 2021, and expired on March 23, 2024, before considering any new work. That permit lapsed on September 28, 2023, after a second strike code violation. An extension was granted until March 23, 2024 and is now expired. Please see attached timeline and depiction of various violations, strikes and fines.
The property was under a Second Strike Stop Work Order from November 2022 to June 2023, issued for (1) performing work without approved plans, (2) work without permits and (3) performing work after hours. In June 2023 the building department consented to lift the Stop Work Order to allow completion of the pool and construct a 7-foot wall. To date, only the pool has been completed.
As noted in our previous letter, the temporary chainlink fence was placed on our property line without our consent when our son was 3– he is now 6 years old. This has gone on 29 months; too long.
We commend Code Enforcement's decision to impose the maximum daily fine at $250/day fine for the unauthorized balcony and door, reflecting the property owner's lack of respect for the board's guidelines and our community's character. We do feel this fine, although the maximum allowable, is insufficient in motivating the family to bring the project in line, as evidenced by their appealing to ARCOM both last month and this month. We urge the town to keep up with inflation and property values and increase the Code Enforcements authority by levying a daily fine of $1000/day.
We gave consent for the Bergers to complete the permitted 7-foot wall both in March 2023 and again in August 2023. Completing this wall is critical and urgent for safety, and we urge the town to ensure its prompt completion.
We request the board to deny the new application for the following reasons:
1. **Inconsistency with Alley Construction:** The proposed changes do not conform to the established construction practices of Clarke Alley, which include 7-foot site walls AND French drains. Every property built over the last 50 years, except for the subject property has both. Maintaining a consistent pattern of high site walls and French drains is an essential design and safety principle. The plating of the Sea Streets is much tighter than other areas of the island and therefore high walls between properties are the standard for noise mitigation and privacy that we expect in Palm Beach.
2. **Drainage Concerns:** Significant water accumulation behind 249 Seabreeze occurs even in non-hurricane conditions. The temporary drainage barrier installed after a de-watering violation in November is insufficient, as is the curb that is proposed and can be easily over run. The letter from our engineer clearly states the 7-foot site wall with footer is the superior engineering for water retention — see engineer letter attachment. Proper rear gutters and French drains are urgently needed, as evidenced by the attached photo from this weekend that shows dry conditions in all other areas of the alley, including those at a lower elevation, with the stark exception of 249 Seabreeze that has a large pool of water directly behind it. (See attached)
3. **Impact on Privacy and Noise Levels:** Neighborhood privacy and noise reduction are compromised due to the lack of a standard 7-foot site wall. The updated interior renovations completed at 249 Seabreeze allowed for larger retracting doors on the rear of the property allowing for additional outdoor living and as such noise. The master bedroom was also relocated to the first floor, just 20 feet from the window of our first floor bedroom and children’s playroom. We can see directly into their master bedroom— this lower proposed wall seems an odd corner to cut after the extensive interior renovations. See photo from inside 301 to master bedroom at 249 Seabreeze.
4. **Landscaping on Property Line:** The proposed landscaping encroaches on our property line as displayed in their drawing where it is shown growing over the property line. (See plans). We urge that the 7 foot site wall sit near our property line with landscaping to be kept within their property boundaries. The proposed pebble driveway is not in keeping with the neighborhood standards of paved driveways. Additionally, there is also a whitefly code enforcement warning violation this week. We ask that they seek native plants as originally outlined in the thoughtful and sensitive plans that were artfully crafted by Nievera William in 2021 and approved by ARCOM as part of this original permit that is now expired.
5. **Additional Hardscape and Drainage:** We urge the board to reject plans for additional hardscaping on the east side of the property until adequate drainage, such as a French drain for the rear driveway and proper gutters and exfiltration in that area is installed (photo of recent post-rain alley flooding attached)
6. **Design of the Aluminum Gates:** The proposed black aluminum gates are modern and do not reflect the historic Mediterranean design character of the neighborhood. Separately, they pose a significant safety concern as outlined below.
7. **Dog Safety Concerns:** The aggressive behavior of the dog at 249 Seabreeze Avenue, that is routinely silenced by an electric shock collars (see attached video) raises serious concerns for the mental welfare of the dog, as well as the safety of our children. This is a known breed of significant safety concerns and is not properly and thoughtfully trained. The proposed aluminum fence is insufficient to contain a potentially dangerous dog, putting our children, pets, and those walking the alley at risk.
Despite our talks with the Bergers and our consent for some specific modifications, there has been a lack of communication and progress. We request that the board enforce the completion of the 7-foot wall per Permit A-23-02895.
The project's prolonged violation of ARCOM recommendations and significant use of town resources warrant a thorough review by the Code Enforcement and Building Department.
We are asking for a comprehensive assessment to ensure compliance with town regulations and offer to serve on a committee to facilitate this review.
It is crucial that a strong message be sent that compliance with town policies is MANDATORY. We trust ARCOM and the Town Council to prioritize community safety and harmony in its decision-making and demonstrate that non-compliance is unacceptable.
We would like to express our gratitude for the building department and code enforcement; it is a shame that all this drain on resources has occurred simply because the subject property has not completed the 7 foot site wall that they have now requested on three separate occasions to complete and have selectively chosen not to.
Thank you for considering our concerns and for your continued efforts to uphold the highest standards of construction and peaceful aesthetics in Palm Beach.
Sincerely,
James and Emily Clifford
Public Comment, Town of Palm Beach Admin
admin
about 1 year ago
Received via email 3.25.24:
Dear Members of ARCOM,
We are writing to you in regard to the proposed plans for modification of 249 Seabreeze Avenue. We live across the street at 240 Seabreeze and have specific concerns about the proposed vehicular gate.
Our neighborhood is characterized by welcoming single-family homes. There are currently no driveway gates on our block of Seabreeze Avenue. We therefore feel that the proposed gate is NOT in harmony with properties in the general area.
If a vehicular gate is ultimately approved for 249 Seabreeze, we ask that special care be taken to ensure the gate’s motor is not audible from neighboring properties.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Jean and Robert Good 240 Seabreeze Avenue Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 3.24.24:
Dear Members of the Planning Commission,
I am writing to express my objection to the proposed requests for the project at 249 Seabreeze, specifically regarding the request for gates and the inadequate stormwater mitigation measures proposed.
Firstly, the request for gates is not in keeping with the character of our neighborhood. Introducing gates would alter the open and welcoming atmosphere that is typical on the SeaStreets. I would like the Planning Commission to consider the impact on the neighborhood's aesthetic and sense of cohesion before approving such a request.
More importantly, I am concerned about the lack of adequate stormwater mitigation measures the owner of 249 Seabreeze is willing to build for their elevated lot. As indicated by the engineering report, their proposed 3-foot wall will not effectively prevent storm runoff, putting neighboring properties at risk of flooding. Recent photos also demonstrate how neighboring homes have already experienced flooding, even outside of hurricane season.
It is worth noting that before we constructed our properties at 316 and 320 Seabreeze, we were required to build a 7-foot wall with a deeply trenched "foot" to protect the older, lower home next door from flooding. While this was a significant expense, ARCOM deemed it necessary to ensure compatibility between the two properties and prevent stormwater runoff. There has not been any flooding or runoff from our homes.
I urge the Planning Commission to require the owners of 249 Seabreeze to adhere to similar standards and construct a 7-foot wall designed as the engineer recommended to mitigate stormwater runoff adequately. This measure is essential to protecting neighboring properties from potential damage and maintaining the integrity of our neighborhood.
Thank you for considering my concerns. I trust that the Planning Commission will prioritize the well-being and safety of our community when making decisions regarding the proposed project at 249 Seabreeze.
Sincerely,
Lauren Fisher
320 Seabreeze Ave
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 3.24.24:
As a resident of a landmark home on Clarke Avenue since 2007, I am privileged to live with the historic charm that is unique to Palm Beach. The architectural heritage of our town is a source of pride for all residents, and it is essential that we preserve this legacy for future generations.
With the increased new construction and lot coverage, the Clarke Alley is shouldering more drainage than ever before. It is increasingly urgent that homeowners undergoing extensive construction, such as that done at 249 Seabreeze, uphold the proper Palm Beach aesthetics and standards—including the construction of the approved 7 foot perimeter privacy walls.
I am aware that the family at 249 Seabreeze is requesting a chain-link fence. In addition to not being as deep or substantial in its retention of sediment and water, the fence would be the only chain-link fence perimeter enclosure on a home built in the last 50 years facing the Clarke Alley. I respectfully urge the committee continue to uphold the current approved plan. I am pleased to know Code Enforcement has levied the maximum fine for non compliance with approved ARCOM plans.
It is crucial that we maintain the architectural integrity of our neighborhood and adhere to the approved plans. Any deviations from these standards would detract from the beauty, safety and character of our community.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I trust that you will make the decision that best serves the interests of our community and upholds the cherished traditions of Palm Beach.
Sincerely,
Ann Heathwood
300 Clarke Avenue
Received via email 3.23.24:
Dear Members of The Town of Palm Beach ARCOM Board,
I am writing this letter to oppose the proposed modifications of a fence at 249 Seabreeze Avenue. The modifications aim to change a 7-foot approved site wall to a proposed 6-inch wall and black aluminum bar fencing.
As a resident with a property on the Clarke Avenue alley, I have seen first-hand the flooding problems during heavy rain. A 6-inch wall and black aluminum bar fencing would not have the same ability to retain water as a 7-foot site wall would. Additionally, it would not meet the architectural, drainage, and noise standards observed by every other home on the tight lots of Seabreeze and Clarke Ave.
Furthermore, there is a large and ferocious German Shepherd who resides at this property. The approved 7-foot wall would serve as a much-needed barrier.
I urge ARCOM to uphold the approved 7-foot site wall at 249 Seabreeze Avenue.
Sincerely,
Kathy Georgas
Received via email 3.23.24:
Dear Members of The Town of Palm Beach Architectural Commission (ARCOM),
I am writing to express concern regarding the proposed modification of the 7-foot site wall at 249 Seabreeze Ave to a 6-inch curb with vegetation. As a neighbor and owner of 240 Clarke Avenue, I strongly advocate for upholding the originally approved 7-foot site wall.
Maintaining the 7-foot site wall aligns with Palm Beach's architectural standards, ensuring consistency in aesthetics and privacy among neighboring properties. The proposed 6-inch curb with vegetation does not adhere to the established norms and would compromise both architectural integrity and privacy.
Additionally, the taller wall serves practical purposes, such as noise reduction and environmental stability, which are crucial for the well-being of residents in the area.
In conclusion, I urge ARCOM to reject the proposed modification and uphold the approved 7-foot site wall at 249 Seabreeze Ave. This decision is essential for preserving the architectural harmony and privacy that each neighbor has adhered to.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Ashlee Wilson Clarke
240 Clarke Avenue
Palm Beach, Florida 33480
Received via mail 3.25.24:
Dear Palm Beach ARCOM Board Members,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed modifications for the fence at 249 Seabreeze Avenue. It has come to my attention that there have been code enforcement fines and stop work orders issued for this property, indicating a disregard for the town's policies and procedures regarding construction projects.
Living on Seabreeze, I have witnessed firsthand the challenges posed by heavy rain and flooding. The proposed 6-inch wall and black aluminum bar fencing would not adequately address these issues compared to the approved 7-foot site wall. Additionally, it fails to meet the architectural standards and privacy needs of our neighborhood.
Given the history of code enforcement fines and stop work orders, it is clear that this project lacks adherence to the town's policies and procedures. As a long-time resident, I urge ARCOM to uphold the highest standards of integrity, privacy, and drainage by insisting on the approved 7-foot site wall and thoughtful exfiltration.
Furthermore, considering the presence of a large German Shepherd and neighboring children, the 7- foot wall would provide essential safety measures.
Additionally, I request a reduction in the use of chemical spraying for whiteflies and the removal of ficus hedges in our neighborhood.
I implore ARCOM to consider the broader implications of this project and to prioritize the well-being and aesthetics of our community. Please uphold the approved 7-foot site wall and implement a native planting scheme at 249 Seabreeze.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Dorothy Martin
312 Seabreeze Ave
Palm Beach Florida
33480
Received via email 3.25.24:
Dear Members of ARCOM,
We are writing to you in regard to the proposed plans for modification of 249 Seabreeze Avenue. We live across the street at 240 Seabreeze and have specific concerns about the proposed vehicular gate.
Our neighborhood is characterized by welcoming single-family homes. There are currently no driveway gates on our block of Seabreeze Avenue. We therefore feel that the proposed gate is NOT in harmony with properties in the general area.
If a vehicular gate is ultimately approved for 249 Seabreeze, we ask that special care be taken to ensure the gate’s motor is not audible from neighboring properties.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Jean and Robert Good 240 Seabreeze Avenue Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 3.26.24:
Dear Members of The Town of Palm Beach Architectural Review Commission Board,
We are the immediate west-adjacent neighbors
of 249 Seabreeze Avenue. We strongly oppose any further modifications to this property and urge you to DENY ALL REQUESTS.
We urge instead that the board examine the outstanding issues related to Permit A-23-02895, approved on March 29, 2021, and expired on March 23, 2024, before considering any new work. That permit lapsed on September 28, 2023, after a second strike code violation. An extension was granted until March 23, 2024 and is now expired. Please see attached timeline and depiction of various violations, strikes and fines.
The property was under a Second Strike Stop Work Order from November 2022 to June 2023, issued for (1) performing work without approved plans, (2) work without permits and (3) performing work after hours. In June 2023 the building department consented to lift the Stop Work Order to allow completion of the pool and construct a 7-foot wall. To date, only the pool has been completed.
As noted in our previous letter, the temporary chainlink fence was placed on our property line without our consent when our son was 3– he is now 6 years old. This has gone on 29 months; too long.
We commend Code Enforcement's decision to impose the maximum daily fine at $250/day fine for the unauthorized balcony and door, reflecting the property owner's lack of respect for the board's guidelines and our community's character. We do feel this fine, although the maximum allowable, is insufficient in motivating the family to bring the project in line, as evidenced by their appealing to ARCOM both last month and this month. We urge the town to keep up with inflation and property values and increase the Code Enforcements authority by levying a daily fine of $1000/day.
We gave consent for the Bergers to complete the permitted 7-foot wall both in March 2023 and again in August 2023. Completing this wall is critical and urgent for safety, and we urge the town to ensure its prompt completion.
We request the board to deny the new application for the following reasons:
1. **Inconsistency with Alley Construction:** The proposed changes do not conform to the established construction practices of Clarke Alley, which include 7-foot site walls AND French drains. Every property built over the last 50 years, except for the subject property has both. Maintaining a consistent pattern of high site walls and French drains is an essential design and safety principle. The plating of the Sea Streets is much tighter than other areas of the island and therefore high walls between properties are the standard for noise mitigation and privacy that we expect in Palm Beach.
2. **Drainage Concerns:** Significant water accumulation behind 249 Seabreeze occurs even in non-hurricane conditions. The temporary drainage barrier installed after a de-watering violation in November is insufficient, as is the curb that is proposed and can be easily over run. The letter from our engineer clearly states the 7-foot site wall with footer is the superior engineering for water retention — see engineer letter attachment. Proper rear gutters and French drains are urgently needed, as evidenced by the attached photo from this weekend that shows dry conditions in all other areas of the alley, including those at a lower elevation, with the stark exception of 249 Seabreeze that has a large pool of water directly behind it. (See attached)
3. **Impact on Privacy and Noise Levels:** Neighborhood privacy and noise reduction are compromised due to the lack of a standard 7-foot site wall. The updated interior renovations completed at 249 Seabreeze allowed for larger retracting doors on the rear of the property allowing for additional outdoor living and as such noise. The master bedroom was also relocated to the first floor, just 20 feet from the window of our first floor bedroom and children’s playroom. We can see directly into their master bedroom— this lower proposed wall seems an odd corner to cut after the extensive interior renovations. See photo from inside 301 to master bedroom at 249 Seabreeze.
4. **Landscaping on Property Line:** The proposed landscaping encroaches on our property line as displayed in their drawing where it is shown growing over the property line. (See plans). We urge that the 7 foot site wall sit near our property line with landscaping to be kept within their property boundaries. The proposed pebble driveway is not in keeping with the neighborhood standards of paved driveways. Additionally, there is also a whitefly code enforcement warning violation this week. We ask that they seek native plants as originally outlined in the thoughtful and sensitive plans that were artfully crafted by Nievera William in 2021 and approved by ARCOM as part of this original permit that is now expired.
5. **Additional Hardscape and Drainage:** We urge the board to reject plans for additional hardscaping on the east side of the property until adequate drainage, such as a French drain for the rear driveway and proper gutters and exfiltration in that area is installed (photo of recent post-rain alley flooding attached)
6. **Design of the Aluminum Gates:** The proposed black aluminum gates are modern and do not reflect the historic Mediterranean design character of the neighborhood. Separately, they pose a significant safety concern as outlined below.
7. **Dog Safety Concerns:** The aggressive behavior of the dog at 249 Seabreeze Avenue, that is routinely silenced by an electric shock collars (see attached video) raises serious concerns for the mental welfare of the dog, as well as the safety of our children. This is a known breed of significant safety concerns and is not properly and thoughtfully trained. The proposed aluminum fence is insufficient to contain a potentially dangerous dog, putting our children, pets, and those walking the alley at risk.
Despite our talks with the Bergers and our consent for some specific modifications, there has been a lack of communication and progress. We request that the board enforce the completion of the 7-foot wall per Permit A-23-02895.
The project's prolonged violation of ARCOM recommendations and significant use of town resources warrant a thorough review by the Code Enforcement and Building Department.
We are asking for a comprehensive assessment to ensure compliance with town regulations and offer to serve on a committee to facilitate this review.
It is crucial that a strong message be sent that compliance with town policies is MANDATORY. We trust ARCOM and the Town Council to prioritize community safety and harmony in its decision-making and demonstrate that non-compliance is unacceptable.
We would like to express our gratitude for the building department and code enforcement; it is a shame that all this drain on resources has occurred simply because the subject property has not completed the 7 foot site wall that they have now requested on three separate occasions to complete and have selectively chosen not to.
Thank you for considering our concerns and for your continued efforts to uphold the highest standards of construction and peaceful aesthetics in Palm Beach.
Sincerely,
James and Emily Clifford
Received via email 3.25.24:
Dear Members of ARCOM,
We are writing to you in regard to the proposed plans for modification of 249 Seabreeze Avenue. We live across the street at 240 Seabreeze and have specific concerns about the proposed vehicular gate.
Our neighborhood is characterized by welcoming single-family homes. There are currently no driveway gates on our block of Seabreeze Avenue. We therefore feel that the proposed gate is NOT in harmony with properties in the general area.
If a vehicular gate is ultimately approved for 249 Seabreeze, we ask that special care be taken to ensure the gate’s motor is not audible from neighboring properties.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Jean and Robert Good 240 Seabreeze Avenue Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 3.24.24:
Dear Members of the Planning Commission,
I am writing to express my objection to the proposed requests for the project at 249 Seabreeze, specifically regarding the request for gates and the inadequate stormwater mitigation measures proposed.
Firstly, the request for gates is not in keeping with the character of our neighborhood. Introducing gates would alter the open and welcoming atmosphere that is typical on the SeaStreets. I would like the Planning Commission to consider the impact on the neighborhood's aesthetic and sense of cohesion before approving such a request.
More importantly, I am concerned about the lack of adequate stormwater mitigation measures the owner of 249 Seabreeze is willing to build for their elevated lot. As indicated by the engineering report, their proposed 3-foot wall will not effectively prevent storm runoff, putting neighboring properties at risk of flooding. Recent photos also demonstrate how neighboring homes have already experienced flooding, even outside of hurricane season.
It is worth noting that before we constructed our properties at 316 and 320 Seabreeze, we were required to build a 7-foot wall with a deeply trenched "foot" to protect the older, lower home next door from flooding. While this was a significant expense, ARCOM deemed it necessary to ensure compatibility between the two properties and prevent stormwater runoff. There has not been any flooding or runoff from our homes.
I urge the Planning Commission to require the owners of 249 Seabreeze to adhere to similar standards and construct a 7-foot wall designed as the engineer recommended to mitigate stormwater runoff adequately. This measure is essential to protecting neighboring properties from potential damage and maintaining the integrity of our neighborhood.
Thank you for considering my concerns. I trust that the Planning Commission will prioritize the well-being and safety of our community when making decisions regarding the proposed project at 249 Seabreeze.
Sincerely,
Lauren Fisher
320 Seabreeze Ave
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 3.24.24:
As a resident of a landmark home on Clarke Avenue since 2007, I am privileged to live with the historic charm that is unique to Palm Beach. The architectural heritage of our town is a source of pride for all residents, and it is essential that we preserve this legacy for future generations.
With the increased new construction and lot coverage, the Clarke Alley is shouldering more drainage than ever before. It is increasingly urgent that homeowners undergoing extensive construction, such as that done at 249 Seabreeze, uphold the proper Palm Beach aesthetics and standards—including the construction of the approved 7 foot perimeter privacy walls.
I am aware that the family at 249 Seabreeze is requesting a chain-link fence. In addition to not being as deep or substantial in its retention of sediment and water, the fence would be the only chain-link fence perimeter enclosure on a home built in the last 50 years facing the Clarke Alley. I respectfully urge the committee continue to uphold the current approved plan. I am pleased to know Code Enforcement has levied the maximum fine for non compliance with approved ARCOM plans.
It is crucial that we maintain the architectural integrity of our neighborhood and adhere to the approved plans. Any deviations from these standards would detract from the beauty, safety and character of our community.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I trust that you will make the decision that best serves the interests of our community and upholds the cherished traditions of Palm Beach.
Sincerely,
Ann Heathwood
300 Clarke Avenue
Received via email 3.23.24:
Dear Members of The Town of Palm Beach ARCOM Board,
I am writing this letter to oppose the proposed modifications of a fence at 249 Seabreeze Avenue. The modifications aim to change a 7-foot approved site wall to a proposed 6-inch wall and black aluminum bar fencing.
As a resident with a property on the Clarke Avenue alley, I have seen first-hand the flooding problems during heavy rain. A 6-inch wall and black aluminum bar fencing would not have the same ability to retain water as a 7-foot site wall would. Additionally, it would not meet the architectural, drainage, and noise standards observed by every other home on the tight lots of Seabreeze and Clarke Ave.
Furthermore, there is a large and ferocious German Shepherd who resides at this property. The approved 7-foot wall would serve as a much-needed barrier.
I urge ARCOM to uphold the approved 7-foot site wall at 249 Seabreeze Avenue.
Sincerely,
Kathy Georgas
Received via email 3.23.24:
Dear Members of The Town of Palm Beach Architectural Commission (ARCOM),
I am writing to express concern regarding the proposed modification of the 7-foot site wall at 249 Seabreeze Ave to a 6-inch curb with vegetation. As a neighbor and owner of 240 Clarke Avenue, I strongly advocate for upholding the originally approved 7-foot site wall.
Maintaining the 7-foot site wall aligns with Palm Beach's architectural standards, ensuring consistency in aesthetics and privacy among neighboring properties. The proposed 6-inch curb with vegetation does not adhere to the established norms and would compromise both architectural integrity and privacy.
Additionally, the taller wall serves practical purposes, such as noise reduction and environmental stability, which are crucial for the well-being of residents in the area.
In conclusion, I urge ARCOM to reject the proposed modification and uphold the approved 7-foot site wall at 249 Seabreeze Ave. This decision is essential for preserving the architectural harmony and privacy that each neighbor has adhered to.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Ashlee Wilson Clarke
240 Clarke Avenue
Palm Beach, Florida 33480
Received via mail 3.25.24:
Dear Palm Beach ARCOM Board Members,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed modifications for the fence at 249 Seabreeze Avenue. It has come to my attention that there have been code enforcement fines and stop work orders issued for this property, indicating a disregard for the town's policies and procedures regarding construction projects.
Living on Seabreeze, I have witnessed firsthand the challenges posed by heavy rain and flooding. The proposed 6-inch wall and black aluminum bar fencing would not adequately address these issues compared to the approved 7-foot site wall. Additionally, it fails to meet the architectural standards and privacy needs of our neighborhood.
Given the history of code enforcement fines and stop work orders, it is clear that this project lacks adherence to the town's policies and procedures. As a long-time resident, I urge ARCOM to uphold the highest standards of integrity, privacy, and drainage by insisting on the approved 7-foot site wall and thoughtful exfiltration.
Furthermore, considering the presence of a large German Shepherd and neighboring children, the 7- foot wall would provide essential safety measures.
Additionally, I request a reduction in the use of chemical spraying for whiteflies and the removal of ficus hedges in our neighborhood.
I implore ARCOM to consider the broader implications of this project and to prioritize the well-being and aesthetics of our community. Please uphold the approved 7-foot site wall and implement a native planting scheme at 249 Seabreeze.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Dorothy Martin
312 Seabreeze Ave
Palm Beach Florida
33480