Public Comment, Town of Palm Beach Admin
admin
about 1 year ago
Received via email 2.13.24:
My name is Roy Lipson. I reside at 3250 S Ocean Blvd 509s, Palm Beach, Florida 33480. I vote in Florida and pay taxes here. I am vehemently opposed to the above amendment. Any development work needs to go through usually and customary process. Planning, Zoning, and Building Dept variance procedures. Palm Beach Island is a beautiful simple safe space. We are not overrun with traffic. Please keep the Island serene. Please note that high rises (and all the attendant issues that come from high density housing ) are not welcome here. Please keep the character of Palm Beach Island as is.
I am also disappointed that this issue came up in November 2023 and we are just being given notice at this late date. This is curious to me. Please consider my above comments.
Thanks,
Roy Lipson
Received via email 2.14.24:
To the Members of the Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean Boulevard, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed by the Council on February 14, 2024.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood. Increased density, more traffic and environmental concerns are at the forefront of my request that you reject the developer’s request. Town Council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to ensure the Town retains its low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the South End to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our Town. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
Developers can submit their plans and request variances - to be voted up or down. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents, and are far beyond the scope of the project at issue.
Respectfully,
Martha Mathias
2500 S Ocean Blvd.
Palm Beach
Received via email 2.14.24:
To the Members of the Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean Boulevard, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed by the Council on February 14, 2024.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood. Increased density, more traffic and environmental concerns are at the forefront of my request that you reject the developer’s request. Town Council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to ensure the Town retains its low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the South End to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our Town. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
Developers can submit their plans and request variances - to be voted up or down. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents, and are far beyond the scope of the project at issue.
Respectfully,
Susan Maurais
2500 S Ocean Blvd.
Palm Beach
Received via email 2.13.24:
Dear Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
I urge you to reject these amendments
Sincerely,
Lauren Spector
2500 South Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.13.24:
>>> Dear Town Council:
>>>
>>> I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
>>>
>>> Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
>>>
>>> Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
>>> There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
>>>
>>> I urge you to reject these amendments
Jon Hendel
Received via email 2.13.24:
Dear Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
Why should the zoning ordinance be changed? Who does it benefit? And if the proponents pushing for these changes want concessions let them seek variances on a case by case basis.
Armand J. Gelinas
2500 S Ocean Blvd, Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.13.24:
Re: Pending text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance
Over the past few months the Aman group has shared with adjoining property owners its plans for the redevelopment of the Ambassador Hotel property and the property directly on the West side South Ocean Blvd. Based on the reaction of adjoining owners they have apparently concluded that they would not be successful in obtaining approvals for what they want to do with the property. So instead they have initiated a number of text amendments to the zoning ordinance.
Don’t be fooled by their claimed benefits to the community of their proposed amendments, namely, the encouragement of the redevelopment of older properties and the reduction in the amount of variance hearings that the Town would have to hold. The purpose of the text amendments is for them to avoid the Town focusing on their overreaching development plan and instead to have the Town focus on generalities.
The Town should hold off for now on text amendment and let the Aman Group go through the variance route. At the hearing on the variances, as each issue is discussed it can be compared to the related proposed text amendment and then judgments can be made as to whether it would have been preferable to have a particular text amendment in place. In effect a real life test of whether a text amendment should be adopted.
Sincerely,
The 2770 S. Ocean Blvd. Condominium Board of Directors
2770 South Ocean Boulevard. Condominium Association, Inc.
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Office: (561) 547-0268
FAX: (561) 547-1593
Board of Directors
Joanne Sorkin, President
Clay Lifflander, Vice President
Sidney Lassen, Secretary
Irwin Shechtman, Treasurer
Gerald Heller
Arnold Schuster
Gail DelPrete
Received via email 2.13.24:
>>> Dear Town Council:
>>>
>>> I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
>>>
>>> Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
>>>
>>> Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
>>> There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
>>>
>>> I urge you to reject these amendments
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Peter Marx
>>> 2500 South Ocean Blvd
>>> Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.13.24:
> To our Town Council:
>
> We hereby vehemently oppose the proposed Amendments to be considered tomorrow, February 14, 2024, by Town Council.
>
> Approving these changes to building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected. If implemented, these changes would have a disastrous effect on our quality of life and the character of our neighbourhood, not to mention the severe environmental impact they will have on us all. We residents of the South End deserve the same effort and commitment as you put into preserving the low-key style and charm of downtown Palm Beach.
>
> We elected you to serve us, the community, not to serve developers and investors.
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Two concerned residents at 2500 South Ocean Boulevard.
>
> Please reject these amendments.
>
>
> Walter Bloom and Veronica Baruffati
Received via email 2.13.24:
Dear Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
I urge you to reject these amendments
Sincerely,
Shannon R. Cruz
2500 South Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.13.24:
Dear Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
I urge you to reject these amendments
Sincerely,
Karen DiPietrantonio
2500 South Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.13.24:
Dear Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
I urge you to reject these amendments
Sincerely,
Thor M. Brown
2500 South Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.13.24:
Dear Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
I urge you to reject these amendments
Sharon Katz Rimland, LCSW
2500 South Ocean Blvd, Apt 3A3
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.13.24:
> To the Members of the Town Council:
>
> I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean Boulevard, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed by the Council on February 14, 2024.
>
> Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
>
> Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood. Increased density, more traffic and environmental concerns are at the forefront of my request that you reject the developer’s request. Town Council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to ensure the Town retains its low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the South End to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our Town. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
>
> Developers can submit their plans and request variances - to be voted up or down. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents, and are far beyond the scope of the project at issue.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> David Zises
> 2500 S Ocean Blvd.
> Palm Beach
Received via email 2.13.24:
To the Members of the Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean Boulevard, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed by the Council on February 14, 2024. My family is a 2nd generation owner in this building.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood. Increased density, more traffic and environmental concerns are at the forefront of my request that you reject the developer’s request. Town Council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to ensure the Town retains its low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the South End to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our Town. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
Developers can submit their plans and request variances - to be voted up or down. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents, and are far beyond the scope of the project at issue.
Respectfully,
Margery Zises
2500 S Ocean Blvd.
Palm Beach
Received via email 2.13.24:
I also am a resident at 2500 South Ocean Blvd. I am writing you to offer my full agreement with the views voiced by Ms. Yanofsky. I completely agree with the argument that she has made to back away from this proposed collection of dramatic changes in these zoning and building regulations. I strongly request that they be rejected as a group. They may be considered on a case-by-case basis as they may arise in the future.
Respectfully,
Dr. Edward A. Brown
2500 South Ocean Blvd.
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.13.24:
Dear Town Council:
I am a long-time seasonal visitor and resident of Palm Beach since 1971 at The Patrician, then at Beach Point when it was built, and now at 2500 South Ocean where I reside full time. I am unable to attend the February 14th Town Council meeting, and I thank you for the opportunity to express my opinion in writing.
I’m concerned that both the process and several of the proposed text amendments appear to benefit outside developers to the detriment of town residents. Changes made by text amendment will empower developers at the expense residents by reducing the scrutiny placed on all future projects. I’m particularly concerned about increases to building height, reductions in setbacks, and permissible rooftop amenities. We already have roadway enlargements being forced upon us by the state, and I fear that some of these proposed text amendments will further degrade the peaceful, unimposing feel of the neighborhood.
I welcome redevelopment of some of the older properties, but allowing outside developers to rewrite our regulations so that they can fit in larger buildings will change the nature of the community. If they can’t play by the rules or get variances that satisfy the Town on a case specific basis, perhaps they should go somewhere else. The island isn’t getting any bigger and neither should the buildings. Keep the product the same and let the laws of supply and demand dictate the developers’ profits – not the size of the buildings.
You have already begun an in-house review of zoning regulations, based heavily on resident input, please stay the course. Don’t outsource the process to developers who look upon our town as just another project – this is our home.
Thank you for your service to the Town.
Best regards,
Greg Silpe
2500 South Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.13.24:
Members of Palm Beach Town Council:
As a resident of 2500 S Ocean Boulevard, Palm Beach, I have always taken intense pleasure and pride in how Palm Beach governance has established and enforced zoning and building restrictions that preserve our Town’s charming and low density character. I am therefore writing to Council in opposition to the proposed Code Text Amendment for the RD(2) Residential District that will be discussed at the Town Council meeting of February 14, 2024. The increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximums and setbacks that are proposed by this Amendment will not only impact the unique character of southern Palm Beach, but will also increase density and traffic congestion. Moreover, and very importantly, some of the proposed changes will cause damage to watersheds, drainage and flooding, which will directly affect our beach, sand dunes and intercoastal waterway.
Furthermore, I urge Town Council to reject this proposed Amendment in light of the fact that the Town has already begun a thorough study and reworking of the Zoning Code of Ordinances. This broad and thoughtful process would undoubtedly be the most effective forum for making important zoning decisions.
Respectfully,
Nancy Maklan
2500 S Ocean Boulevard
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.12.24:
> Dear Town Council:
>
> I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
>
> Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
>
> Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
> There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
>
> I urge you to reject these amendments
>
> Sincerely,
> Lauren Spector
> 2500 South Ocean Blvd
> Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.12.24:
Dear Town Council:
>>>>
>>>> I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean and am writing to share my strong concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
>>>>
>>>> Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
>>>>
>>>> Approving those changes would be highly detrimental to the character of our neighborhood. Increased building density, traffic and a significant environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Our Town Council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach in order to insure that the City retains its distinctively ‘low key’ style and charm. Why would anyone want to subject the south end of Palm Beach to changes that would most certainly be rejected in other parts of our city?
>>>> There is no need for these dramatic changes which only further the mercenary interests of developers and investors but are clearly contrary to the interests of residents.
>>>>
>>>> I urge you to reject these amendments.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
Maria and Jacques Brand
2500 South Ocean Blvd
>>>> Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.12.24:
> Dear Town Council:
>
> I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
>
> Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
>
> Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood. Increased density, more traffic and environmental concerns at the forefront of my request you do not grant approval.
>
> Developers can submit their plans and request variances - to be voted up or down. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
>
> Sincerely,
William D. Yahn
Received via email 2.12.24:
Dear Town Council:
We are full time residents having moved to this lovely town approximately six years ago.
It has come to our attention that changes proposed to the current zoning and building codes are to be discussed at the 2/14/24 Town Council meeting. Unfortunately, we will not be able to attend the meeting, however we wish to express our strongest objection to the proposed amendments.
In lieu of submitting variance requests for the subject property, the developer is proposing changes that will serve no one’s best interest other than the developer. In fact, assuming the developer will be constructing for sale condominiums, the developer will be long gone and not have to live with the consequences of these disastrous changes.
No one should object to changes need to comply with current building and safety codes. The proposed changes far exceed what is needed and should be resoundingly rejected.
The Town Council has done a wonderful job looking out for and acting in the best interests of its residents. We have confidence the Council will reject these changes.
Sincerely,
Michelle and Robert Kleiman
2500 South Ocean Blvd, 2-d-5
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.12.24:
As a long term resident at 2500 South Ocean I object to efforts by the law firm of SHUTTS and Bowen LLP to try to circumvent the Towns effort to review and improve the zoning.
As a non lawyer, I do not have the knowledge or expertise to understand the ramifications of the proposed changes but on principal do not want higher density construction. The area between Sloans Curve and Lake Worth bridge already has a high density, continuous traffic and ongoing construction from essential structural work needed to conform with Town and State standards as a result of the Surfside disaster.
The developer made a decision to purchase the property knowing the standards for R-D(2) and should NOT now try to have them changed to increase the footprint of the property.
We do not want our neighbourhood to become like Boca or Miami.
We urge you to reject this proposal and not make changes to the zoning laws until the Town of Palm Beach completes and ratifies it plan.
Thanks for your consideration
Sincerely
Martin Smith
Received via email 2.12.24:
To the Members of the Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean Boulevard, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed by the Council on February 14, 2024.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood. Increased density, more traffic and environmental concerns are at the forefront of my request that you reject the developer’s request. Town Council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to ensure the Town retains its low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the South End to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our Town. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
Developers can submit their plans and request variances - to be voted up or down. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents, and are far beyond the scope of the project at issue.
Respectfully,
Nancy Yanofsky
2500 S Ocean Blvd.
Palm Beach
Received via email 2.12.24:
Members of the Council:
I am writing as a resident of 2500 South Ocean Boulevard in Palm Beach. I am also writing to you as a board member of that Condominium Association, on behalf of all of 2500’s owner residents. I have substantial concerns about the proposed changes to our town’s zoning and building codes, scheduled to be discussed but the Palm Beach Town Council on February 14, 2024.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, reduction of setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected. The proposed changes will harm my family, our neighbors and the broader Palm Beach Community. Palm Beach is a unique and wonderful community, and the support of the Town Council to implement and enforce zoning and building restrictions has been important to maintaining our town’s character.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of our concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our town. All of Palm Beach is wonderful, and deserves to be protected in its entirety.
Palm Beach has many examples of thoughtful development that complies with the existing regulations. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve real estate developers and investors, and are detrimental to the residents who are your principal constituency.
I urge you to reject the proposed amendments. Thank you for your time and attention.
Respectfully,
Michael J. Zimmerman
2500 South Ocean Boulevard
Palm Beach, Florida. 33480
Received via email 2.12.24:
Dear Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
I urge you to reject these amendments. WHO WILL THESE CHANGES BENEFIT?
Sincerely,
Linda Sosnowitz
2500 South Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.12.24:
I am a resident @ 2500 S Ocean Blvd.
I am vehemently opposed to any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks.
Approving those changes, is detrimental to our
neighborhood.
These proposed changes would serve the developers, investors, and not your residents.
Sincerely,
Maureen Hurley
2500 S Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach FL 33480
Why such short notice to respond? I'll be interested to find out why.
Received via email 2.12.24:
Dear Council,
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
I urge you to reject these amendments
Sincerely,
Steve Spector
2500 South Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.12.24:
>>>> Dear Town Council:
>>>>
>>>> I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
>>>>
>>>> Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
>>>>
>>>> Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
>>>> There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
>>>>
>>>> I urge you to reject these amendments
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
Lawrence Shields
>>>> 2500 South Ocean Blvd
>>>> Palm Beach, FL 33480
>>>>
Lawrence P. Shields
Received via email 2.12.24:
To our Town Council:
We hereby vehemently oppose the proposed Amendments to be considered tomorrow, February 14, 2024, by Town Council.
Approving these changes to building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected. If implemented, these changes would have a disastrous effect on our quality of life and the character of our neighbourhood, not to mention the severe environmental impact they will have on us all. We residents of the South End deserve the same effort and commitment as you put into preserving the low-key style and charm of downtown Palm Beach.
We elected you to serve us, the community, not to serve developers and investors.
Yours sincerely,
Two concerned residents at 2500 South Ocean Boulevard.
Please reject these amendments.
Veronica Baruffati and Walter Bloom
Received via email 2.12.24:
I'm a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
I urge you to reject these amendments
As a paying tax payer this is unexceptable
2500 South Ocean Bld. 3-D-4
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Sincerely,
Pat Dipietrantonio
Patra Capital
Received via email 2.12.24:
I wish to express my opposition to the above proposed zoning code amendment. Such a change in the zoning law would be a disaster to the density, environment, causing further erosion, take away the beauty of the local vista's, and set off a construction land rush that would upset the tranquility of this section of Palm Beach with noise and heavy truck traffic.
Betsy J Silverman
Apt 102S
3100 S Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach, Florida 33489
Received via email 2.12.24:
Dear Council Members,
I am writing in opposition to the proposed Aman-Oko Group Text Amendment to be discussed on February 14th. I believe it is wrong to handle what should be a request for a variance in this manner for a number of reasons. These include the long term damage to the appearance and functioning of the Town south of Sloan’s Curve, and the impropriety of appearing to or actually catering and acquiescing to the requests of a special interest over the vast majority of the other residents’ interests. It also would be unfair to subject the residents south of Sloan’s curve to a different set of rules than those north of Sloan’s Curve.
Thank you,
Conrad Ehrlich
Palm Beach Hampton
3100 S Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach
Received via email 2.12.24:
Dear Mayor and Town of Palm Beach Town Council Members,
We are writing to express our significant concern over a sought “text change” to the zoning code applicable to the Ambassador project. The project is only a mile north of our home. As you know traffic is already a concern as there is only a single roadway in and out of the area. Over the years, traffic has been steadily increasing. We are not against new development, however, a change to the current zoning which would add even more traffic than permitted to an already burdened area would have a significant negative impact on the community.
The owners of the Ambassador and the Edgewater understood there was zoning in place when they purchased the property, and they should respect that zoning and not damage the character and the experience in our neighborhood with excess density. The owners can create a great project without having to change the code. Making money for developers should not be the only consideration when reviewing proposed changes. Quality of life is very important as that is what makes a community and brings people here to live.
The zoning code of the R-D(2) Heavy Density Residential Zone, says the definition of “purpose” is:
“…of a variety of dwelling types, under carefully controlled conditions, hotels and timesharing uses. Permitted population density falls in the lower range of what is generally considered high density development.”
The proposed change in code will do exactly the opposite of this stated purpose. While I would prefer to keep density in our corridor exactly as it is today, I do understand additional development is inevitable. However, I am concerned that these proposed changes adding even more density will have long term negative impacts on our quality of life and on the values of our homes. Many here have made significant investment in this community. Allowing any and all current and future lots to have rooftop decks is going to make for “party central” and may bring in nonresidents who are not vested in the shared experience of this wonderful barrier island.
Additionally, the density increase in this proposal will necessarily impact more than just this one project. There are approximately 26 lots in the area that fall in this zone just from Lake Worth down to the extent of Town limits, with another dozen or so near Flagler.
Please take careful consideration of the significance of the negative long term impacts of this decision as it is something we as residents strongly oppose.
Thank you,
Barry and SaraLee Larner
Received via email 2.12.24:
I am the Vice President of the Board and I am submitting our opposition letter to the Text Amendment proposed by the Oko-Aman group. We feel strongly that a customized set of Text Amendments in lieu of site specific zoning variances is an inappropriate approach to the redevelopment of the Ambassador/Edgewater parcels for the reasons stated in our letter. Many of the other residents and boards on South Ocean Boulevard we have spoken with concur.
Respectfully submitted,
Clay Lifflander
Received via email 2.12.24:
My name is Gerald Heller and I am a board member and former president of 2770. Attached is a letter which states our concerns regarding the Text Amendment proposed by the group looking to develop the Ambassador.
Interesting that this covers all the necessary variances they need but they want to impose those over our entire area under the guise of helping you make necessary changes. Beware of developer barring gifts.
We have a wonderful life style in South Palm Beach and have always trusted you to preserve it. Please do not let us down.
We would love to see a beautiful new building replace the old Ambassador but not at this cost to the type of area we moved here for.
Thanks you for your consideration and concern.
Gerald Heller
A Concerned Resident
Received via email 2.9.23 from Jackie de Sanctis:
I am not in favor of changing the town ordinance zoning law
Received via email 2.13.24:
My name is Roy Lipson. I reside at 3250 S Ocean Blvd 509s, Palm Beach, Florida 33480. I vote in Florida and pay taxes here. I am vehemently opposed to the above amendment. Any development work needs to go through usually and customary process. Planning, Zoning, and Building Dept variance procedures. Palm Beach Island is a beautiful simple safe space. We are not overrun with traffic. Please keep the Island serene. Please note that high rises (and all the attendant issues that come from high density housing ) are not welcome here. Please keep the character of Palm Beach Island as is.
I am also disappointed that this issue came up in November 2023 and we are just being given notice at this late date. This is curious to me. Please consider my above comments.
Thanks,
Roy Lipson
Received via email 2.14.24:
To the Members of the Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean Boulevard, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed by the Council on February 14, 2024.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood. Increased density, more traffic and environmental concerns are at the forefront of my request that you reject the developer’s request. Town Council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to ensure the Town retains its low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the South End to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our Town. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
Developers can submit their plans and request variances - to be voted up or down. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents, and are far beyond the scope of the project at issue.
Respectfully,
Martha Mathias
2500 S Ocean Blvd.
Palm Beach
Received via email 2.14.24:
To the Members of the Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean Boulevard, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed by the Council on February 14, 2024.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood. Increased density, more traffic and environmental concerns are at the forefront of my request that you reject the developer’s request. Town Council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to ensure the Town retains its low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the South End to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our Town. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
Developers can submit their plans and request variances - to be voted up or down. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents, and are far beyond the scope of the project at issue.
Respectfully,
Susan Maurais
2500 S Ocean Blvd.
Palm Beach
Received via email 2.13.24:
Dear Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
I urge you to reject these amendments
Sincerely,
Lauren Spector
2500 South Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.13.24:
>>> Dear Town Council:
>>>
>>> I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
>>>
>>> Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
>>>
>>> Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
>>> There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
>>>
>>> I urge you to reject these amendments
Jon Hendel
Received via email 2.13.24:
Dear Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
Why should the zoning ordinance be changed? Who does it benefit? And if the proponents pushing for these changes want concessions let them seek variances on a case by case basis.
Armand J. Gelinas
2500 S Ocean Blvd, Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.13.24:
Re: Pending text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance
Over the past few months the Aman group has shared with adjoining property owners its plans for the redevelopment of the Ambassador Hotel property and the property directly on the West side South Ocean Blvd. Based on the reaction of adjoining owners they have apparently concluded that they would not be successful in obtaining approvals for what they want to do with the property. So instead they have initiated a number of text amendments to the zoning ordinance.
Don’t be fooled by their claimed benefits to the community of their proposed amendments, namely, the encouragement of the redevelopment of older properties and the reduction in the amount of variance hearings that the Town would have to hold. The purpose of the text amendments is for them to avoid the Town focusing on their overreaching development plan and instead to have the Town focus on generalities.
The Town should hold off for now on text amendment and let the Aman Group go through the variance route. At the hearing on the variances, as each issue is discussed it can be compared to the related proposed text amendment and then judgments can be made as to whether it would have been preferable to have a particular text amendment in place. In effect a real life test of whether a text amendment should be adopted.
Sincerely,
The 2770 S. Ocean Blvd. Condominium Board of Directors
2770 South Ocean Boulevard. Condominium Association, Inc.
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Office: (561) 547-0268
FAX: (561) 547-1593
Board of Directors
Joanne Sorkin, President
Clay Lifflander, Vice President
Sidney Lassen, Secretary
Irwin Shechtman, Treasurer
Gerald Heller
Arnold Schuster
Gail DelPrete
Received via email 2.13.24:
>>> Dear Town Council:
>>>
>>> I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
>>>
>>> Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
>>>
>>> Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
>>> There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
>>>
>>> I urge you to reject these amendments
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Peter Marx
>>> 2500 South Ocean Blvd
>>> Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.13.24:
> To our Town Council:
>
> We hereby vehemently oppose the proposed Amendments to be considered tomorrow, February 14, 2024, by Town Council.
>
> Approving these changes to building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected. If implemented, these changes would have a disastrous effect on our quality of life and the character of our neighbourhood, not to mention the severe environmental impact they will have on us all. We residents of the South End deserve the same effort and commitment as you put into preserving the low-key style and charm of downtown Palm Beach.
>
> We elected you to serve us, the community, not to serve developers and investors.
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Two concerned residents at 2500 South Ocean Boulevard.
>
> Please reject these amendments.
>
>
> Walter Bloom and Veronica Baruffati
Received via email 2.13.24:
Dear Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
I urge you to reject these amendments
Sincerely,
Shannon R. Cruz
2500 South Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.13.24:
Dear Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
I urge you to reject these amendments
Sincerely,
Karen DiPietrantonio
2500 South Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.13.24:
Dear Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
I urge you to reject these amendments
Sincerely,
Thor M. Brown
2500 South Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.13.24:
Dear Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
I urge you to reject these amendments
Sharon Katz Rimland, LCSW
2500 South Ocean Blvd, Apt 3A3
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.13.24:
> To the Members of the Town Council:
>
> I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean Boulevard, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed by the Council on February 14, 2024.
>
> Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
>
> Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood. Increased density, more traffic and environmental concerns are at the forefront of my request that you reject the developer’s request. Town Council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to ensure the Town retains its low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the South End to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our Town. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
>
> Developers can submit their plans and request variances - to be voted up or down. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents, and are far beyond the scope of the project at issue.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> David Zises
> 2500 S Ocean Blvd.
> Palm Beach
Received via email 2.13.24:
To the Members of the Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean Boulevard, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed by the Council on February 14, 2024. My family is a 2nd generation owner in this building.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood. Increased density, more traffic and environmental concerns are at the forefront of my request that you reject the developer’s request. Town Council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to ensure the Town retains its low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the South End to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our Town. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
Developers can submit their plans and request variances - to be voted up or down. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents, and are far beyond the scope of the project at issue.
Respectfully,
Margery Zises
2500 S Ocean Blvd.
Palm Beach
Received via email 2.13.24:
I also am a resident at 2500 South Ocean Blvd. I am writing you to offer my full agreement with the views voiced by Ms. Yanofsky. I completely agree with the argument that she has made to back away from this proposed collection of dramatic changes in these zoning and building regulations. I strongly request that they be rejected as a group. They may be considered on a case-by-case basis as they may arise in the future.
Respectfully,
Dr. Edward A. Brown
2500 South Ocean Blvd.
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.13.24:
Dear Town Council:
I am a long-time seasonal visitor and resident of Palm Beach since 1971 at The Patrician, then at Beach Point when it was built, and now at 2500 South Ocean where I reside full time. I am unable to attend the February 14th Town Council meeting, and I thank you for the opportunity to express my opinion in writing.
I’m concerned that both the process and several of the proposed text amendments appear to benefit outside developers to the detriment of town residents. Changes made by text amendment will empower developers at the expense residents by reducing the scrutiny placed on all future projects. I’m particularly concerned about increases to building height, reductions in setbacks, and permissible rooftop amenities. We already have roadway enlargements being forced upon us by the state, and I fear that some of these proposed text amendments will further degrade the peaceful, unimposing feel of the neighborhood.
I welcome redevelopment of some of the older properties, but allowing outside developers to rewrite our regulations so that they can fit in larger buildings will change the nature of the community. If they can’t play by the rules or get variances that satisfy the Town on a case specific basis, perhaps they should go somewhere else. The island isn’t getting any bigger and neither should the buildings. Keep the product the same and let the laws of supply and demand dictate the developers’ profits – not the size of the buildings.
You have already begun an in-house review of zoning regulations, based heavily on resident input, please stay the course. Don’t outsource the process to developers who look upon our town as just another project – this is our home.
Thank you for your service to the Town.
Best regards,
Greg Silpe
2500 South Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.13.24:
Members of Palm Beach Town Council:
As a resident of 2500 S Ocean Boulevard, Palm Beach, I have always taken intense pleasure and pride in how Palm Beach governance has established and enforced zoning and building restrictions that preserve our Town’s charming and low density character. I am therefore writing to Council in opposition to the proposed Code Text Amendment for the RD(2) Residential District that will be discussed at the Town Council meeting of February 14, 2024. The increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximums and setbacks that are proposed by this Amendment will not only impact the unique character of southern Palm Beach, but will also increase density and traffic congestion. Moreover, and very importantly, some of the proposed changes will cause damage to watersheds, drainage and flooding, which will directly affect our beach, sand dunes and intercoastal waterway.
Furthermore, I urge Town Council to reject this proposed Amendment in light of the fact that the Town has already begun a thorough study and reworking of the Zoning Code of Ordinances. This broad and thoughtful process would undoubtedly be the most effective forum for making important zoning decisions.
Respectfully,
Nancy Maklan
2500 S Ocean Boulevard
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.12.24:
> Dear Town Council:
>
> I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
>
> Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
>
> Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
> There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
>
> I urge you to reject these amendments
>
> Sincerely,
> Lauren Spector
> 2500 South Ocean Blvd
> Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.12.24:
Dear Town Council:
>>>>
>>>> I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean and am writing to share my strong concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
>>>>
>>>> Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
>>>>
>>>> Approving those changes would be highly detrimental to the character of our neighborhood. Increased building density, traffic and a significant environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Our Town Council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach in order to insure that the City retains its distinctively ‘low key’ style and charm. Why would anyone want to subject the south end of Palm Beach to changes that would most certainly be rejected in other parts of our city?
>>>> There is no need for these dramatic changes which only further the mercenary interests of developers and investors but are clearly contrary to the interests of residents.
>>>>
>>>> I urge you to reject these amendments.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
Maria and Jacques Brand
2500 South Ocean Blvd
>>>> Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.12.24:
> Dear Town Council:
>
> I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
>
> Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
>
> Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood. Increased density, more traffic and environmental concerns at the forefront of my request you do not grant approval.
>
> Developers can submit their plans and request variances - to be voted up or down. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
>
> Sincerely,
William D. Yahn
Received via email 2.12.24:
Dear Town Council:
We are full time residents having moved to this lovely town approximately six years ago.
It has come to our attention that changes proposed to the current zoning and building codes are to be discussed at the 2/14/24 Town Council meeting. Unfortunately, we will not be able to attend the meeting, however we wish to express our strongest objection to the proposed amendments.
In lieu of submitting variance requests for the subject property, the developer is proposing changes that will serve no one’s best interest other than the developer. In fact, assuming the developer will be constructing for sale condominiums, the developer will be long gone and not have to live with the consequences of these disastrous changes.
No one should object to changes need to comply with current building and safety codes. The proposed changes far exceed what is needed and should be resoundingly rejected.
The Town Council has done a wonderful job looking out for and acting in the best interests of its residents. We have confidence the Council will reject these changes.
Sincerely,
Michelle and Robert Kleiman
2500 South Ocean Blvd, 2-d-5
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.12.24:
As a long term resident at 2500 South Ocean I object to efforts by the law firm of SHUTTS and Bowen LLP to try to circumvent the Towns effort to review and improve the zoning.
As a non lawyer, I do not have the knowledge or expertise to understand the ramifications of the proposed changes but on principal do not want higher density construction. The area between Sloans Curve and Lake Worth bridge already has a high density, continuous traffic and ongoing construction from essential structural work needed to conform with Town and State standards as a result of the Surfside disaster.
The developer made a decision to purchase the property knowing the standards for R-D(2) and should NOT now try to have them changed to increase the footprint of the property.
We do not want our neighbourhood to become like Boca or Miami.
We urge you to reject this proposal and not make changes to the zoning laws until the Town of Palm Beach completes and ratifies it plan.
Thanks for your consideration
Sincerely
Martin Smith
Received via email 2.12.24:
To the Members of the Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean Boulevard, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed by the Council on February 14, 2024.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood. Increased density, more traffic and environmental concerns are at the forefront of my request that you reject the developer’s request. Town Council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to ensure the Town retains its low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the South End to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our Town. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
Developers can submit their plans and request variances - to be voted up or down. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents, and are far beyond the scope of the project at issue.
Respectfully,
Nancy Yanofsky
2500 S Ocean Blvd.
Palm Beach
Received via email 2.12.24:
Members of the Council:
I am writing as a resident of 2500 South Ocean Boulevard in Palm Beach. I am also writing to you as a board member of that Condominium Association, on behalf of all of 2500’s owner residents. I have substantial concerns about the proposed changes to our town’s zoning and building codes, scheduled to be discussed but the Palm Beach Town Council on February 14, 2024.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, reduction of setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected. The proposed changes will harm my family, our neighbors and the broader Palm Beach Community. Palm Beach is a unique and wonderful community, and the support of the Town Council to implement and enforce zoning and building restrictions has been important to maintaining our town’s character.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of our concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our town. All of Palm Beach is wonderful, and deserves to be protected in its entirety.
Palm Beach has many examples of thoughtful development that complies with the existing regulations. There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve real estate developers and investors, and are detrimental to the residents who are your principal constituency.
I urge you to reject the proposed amendments. Thank you for your time and attention.
Respectfully,
Michael J. Zimmerman
2500 South Ocean Boulevard
Palm Beach, Florida. 33480
Received via email 2.12.24:
Dear Town Council:
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
I urge you to reject these amendments. WHO WILL THESE CHANGES BENEFIT?
Sincerely,
Linda Sosnowitz
2500 South Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.12.24:
I am a resident @ 2500 S Ocean Blvd.
I am vehemently opposed to any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks.
Approving those changes, is detrimental to our
neighborhood.
These proposed changes would serve the developers, investors, and not your residents.
Sincerely,
Maureen Hurley
2500 S Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach FL 33480
Why such short notice to respond? I'll be interested to find out why.
Received via email 2.12.24:
Dear Council,
I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
I urge you to reject these amendments
Sincerely,
Steve Spector
2500 South Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Received via email 2.12.24:
>>>> Dear Town Council:
>>>>
>>>> I am a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
>>>>
>>>> Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
>>>>
>>>> Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
>>>> There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
>>>>
>>>> I urge you to reject these amendments
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
Lawrence Shields
>>>> 2500 South Ocean Blvd
>>>> Palm Beach, FL 33480
>>>>
Lawrence P. Shields
Received via email 2.12.24:
To our Town Council:
We hereby vehemently oppose the proposed Amendments to be considered tomorrow, February 14, 2024, by Town Council.
Approving these changes to building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected. If implemented, these changes would have a disastrous effect on our quality of life and the character of our neighbourhood, not to mention the severe environmental impact they will have on us all. We residents of the South End deserve the same effort and commitment as you put into preserving the low-key style and charm of downtown Palm Beach.
We elected you to serve us, the community, not to serve developers and investors.
Yours sincerely,
Two concerned residents at 2500 South Ocean Boulevard.
Please reject these amendments.
Veronica Baruffati and Walter Bloom
Received via email 2.12.24:
I'm a resident at 2500 S. Ocean, and write to share my concerns about some of the proposed “text” zoning and building changes being discussed 2/14/24 by Council.
Any increases to current building height restrictions, setback requirements, building footprint size maximum or setbacks should be rejected.
Approving those changes would be detrimental to the character of our neighborhood, Increased density, more traffic and environmental impact are at the forefront of my concerns. Town council has always prided itself on limiting change in Palm Beach to insure the City retains its' low key style and charm. Why would you want to subject the south end to changes you would most certainly reject in other parts of our city.
There is no need for these dramatic changes which only serve developers and investors, not your residents.
I urge you to reject these amendments
As a paying tax payer this is unexceptable
2500 South Ocean Bld. 3-D-4
Palm Beach, FL 33480
Sincerely,
Pat Dipietrantonio
Patra Capital
Received via email 2.12.24:
I wish to express my opposition to the above proposed zoning code amendment. Such a change in the zoning law would be a disaster to the density, environment, causing further erosion, take away the beauty of the local vista's, and set off a construction land rush that would upset the tranquility of this section of Palm Beach with noise and heavy truck traffic.
Betsy J Silverman
Apt 102S
3100 S Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach, Florida 33489
Received via email 2.12.24:
Dear Council Members,
I am writing in opposition to the proposed Aman-Oko Group Text Amendment to be discussed on February 14th. I believe it is wrong to handle what should be a request for a variance in this manner for a number of reasons. These include the long term damage to the appearance and functioning of the Town south of Sloan’s Curve, and the impropriety of appearing to or actually catering and acquiescing to the requests of a special interest over the vast majority of the other residents’ interests. It also would be unfair to subject the residents south of Sloan’s curve to a different set of rules than those north of Sloan’s Curve.
Thank you,
Conrad Ehrlich
Palm Beach Hampton
3100 S Ocean Blvd
Palm Beach
Received via email 2.12.24:
Dear Mayor and Town of Palm Beach Town Council Members,
We are writing to express our significant concern over a sought “text change” to the zoning code applicable to the Ambassador project. The project is only a mile north of our home. As you know traffic is already a concern as there is only a single roadway in and out of the area. Over the years, traffic has been steadily increasing. We are not against new development, however, a change to the current zoning which would add even more traffic than permitted to an already burdened area would have a significant negative impact on the community.
The owners of the Ambassador and the Edgewater understood there was zoning in place when they purchased the property, and they should respect that zoning and not damage the character and the experience in our neighborhood with excess density. The owners can create a great project without having to change the code. Making money for developers should not be the only consideration when reviewing proposed changes. Quality of life is very important as that is what makes a community and brings people here to live.
The zoning code of the R-D(2) Heavy Density Residential Zone, says the definition of “purpose” is:
“…of a variety of dwelling types, under carefully controlled conditions, hotels and timesharing uses. Permitted population density falls in the lower range of what is generally considered high density development.”
The proposed change in code will do exactly the opposite of this stated purpose. While I would prefer to keep density in our corridor exactly as it is today, I do understand additional development is inevitable. However, I am concerned that these proposed changes adding even more density will have long term negative impacts on our quality of life and on the values of our homes. Many here have made significant investment in this community. Allowing any and all current and future lots to have rooftop decks is going to make for “party central” and may bring in nonresidents who are not vested in the shared experience of this wonderful barrier island.
Additionally, the density increase in this proposal will necessarily impact more than just this one project. There are approximately 26 lots in the area that fall in this zone just from Lake Worth down to the extent of Town limits, with another dozen or so near Flagler.
Please take careful consideration of the significance of the negative long term impacts of this decision as it is something we as residents strongly oppose.
Thank you,
Barry and SaraLee Larner
Received via email 2.12.24:
I am the Vice President of the Board and I am submitting our opposition letter to the Text Amendment proposed by the Oko-Aman group. We feel strongly that a customized set of Text Amendments in lieu of site specific zoning variances is an inappropriate approach to the redevelopment of the Ambassador/Edgewater parcels for the reasons stated in our letter. Many of the other residents and boards on South Ocean Boulevard we have spoken with concur.
Respectfully submitted,
Clay Lifflander
Received via email 2.12.24:
My name is Gerald Heller and I am a board member and former president of 2770. Attached is a letter which states our concerns regarding the Text Amendment proposed by the group looking to develop the Ambassador.
Interesting that this covers all the necessary variances they need but they want to impose those over our entire area under the guise of helping you make necessary changes. Beware of developer barring gifts.
We have a wonderful life style in South Palm Beach and have always trusted you to preserve it. Please do not let us down.
We would love to see a beautiful new building replace the old Ambassador but not at this cost to the type of area we moved here for.
Thanks you for your consideration and concern.
Gerald Heller
A Concerned Resident
Received via email 2.9.23 from Jackie de Sanctis:
I am not in favor of changing the town ordinance zoning law