Received via email on 7.17.23:
To the Mayor, Town Council Members and Landmarks Preservation Commission Members:

I am writing in furtherance to my earlier correspondence dated January 1, 2023, to express deep concerns and strong opposition to the Paramount Theatre Project.

I reside with my wife and son at 100 Sunrise Avenue, in Unit 322, in the Town of Palm Beach.
Like many residents, I am away for the summer and hurricane season, but have been monitoring the progress of the Paramount Theatre redevelopment project.

The project appears to be ill conceived, completely unnecessary and wildly destructive
of the quality of life of the local residents, and also appears to be environmentally and potentially structurally destructive to the neighborhood in particular and the Island in general.

I would echo the concerns of many of my neighbors, it appears as if the developer in this case is deliberately trying to manipulate the project approvals process to occur during the summer lull, knowing full-well that many residents are out of town, in order to avoid the level of scrutiny a mega-project of this scope would ordinarily be subject to.

As the facts are unfolding, bit by bit, it appears as if the purported “restoration” of the venerable old Paramount Theatre is – to put it diplomatically – a subterfuge, designed to take attention away from the scope, risks and detrimental impact of what is essentially a mega-project, under a pretext of historical preservation.

If I may offer a few modest suggestions:

• The project should, at a minimum, be put on hold until a proper comprehensive long-term development plan for the Town of Palm Beach can be created. Future development, if any, at the Paramount Theatre site should be done pursuant to a comprehensive plan, developed with input of all relevant stakeholders, incorporating the interests of the Town of Palm Beach and its residents. The current
attempt by Woerner to achieve an “ad hoc” approval of the current mega-project puts the “cart before the horse” – approval of the mega-project would effectively define the character, density, traffic patterns and architecture of this part of Palm Beach for future generations. All future comprehensive planning efforts would, in effect, become subordinated to the needs and wants of one developer, rather than having all development being accomplished pursuant to a well thought out and comprehensive plan.
• If it has not already been done, the Town of Palm Beach should commission its own, independent traffic study, covering the present, the extensive construction period and the post-construction completion period. This study should be at the expense of the developer. I am rather skeptical of the developer’s so-called “independent experts” – we all know that if one engages in sufficient “opinion shopping”, one can always find a purported “expert” willing to say just about anything for a suitable fee.
• Similarly, if it has not already been done, the Town of Palm Beach should commission its own, independent civil and structural engineers to study the feasibility, timing, and potential risks of a long-term, large-scale, multi-year (maybe multi-decade?) excavation project. This study should also be at the expense of the developer. Excavation of this magnitude in a congested space is difficult to comprehend. Whether it’s the geology of the island, the flooding that we experience, and proximity of larger and older structures, and the already congested space where this work will be conducted, it is obvious that such a project will create a never-ending series of problems, both short term and long term. Again, I would tend to be skeptical of the developer’s “independent experts” – its easy to “opinion shop” until you find a cooperative expert.
Given the history of such mega-projects generally, as well as actual smaller-scale excavation projects on Palm Beach Island, we all know that, regardless of any “paper schedule” – the actual construction will inevitably be much, much longer than promised, and will be wildly disruptive, and destructive, for a very, very long period of time.
Even if, or when, the project is completed, there remains the risk of this project having a detrimental impact on the structural integrity of the surrounding buildings, many of which are older vintage construction. I would be interested to see if a reputable, independent professional architectural firm or a licensed civil engineering firm of substance would be willing to sign their name, and reputation, to a report that expressed an actual opinion
(as opposed to a non-opinion) on these risks. Such a report (or, in the alternative, the unwillingness of a reputable firm to render such an opinion) would speak volumes about the permanent risks of the project and, in my view, would carry much more weight than the self-interested and highly-conflicted statements of the developer and its
retained experts.

Thank you in advance for your time in reviewing this correspondence;

Respectfully submitted,

John Veech
100 Sunrise Avenue, Unit 322
Palm Beach, FL

Received via email on 7.18.23:
As an owner of a condo at 100 Sunrise Avenue (Sun & Surf) I am writing to express my strenuous objection to the proposal by the owner of the Paramount project. Developers have a right to upgrade property but this proposal far exceeds any reasonable improvements, especially since the Paramount is such a landmark building.

The proposal would totally overwhelm the lovely corner property via zero setbacks, no green space, and height exceeding the current building-which fits so charmingly into the neighborhood.

And it would overwhelm the neighborhood by establishing a club with 225 members (and perhaps more down the road), adding 2 restaurants, and hosting private events-all of which will bring noise and traffic to an area already overburdened with it. Increasing parking from 46 to 127 spots, plus food and special event deliveries, tell you all you need to know about what a nightmare this would become.

Finally, what will building an underground garage do to the stability of surrounding structures, as well as the congestion?

In short, seeking 20 variances is far out of line with the well protected character and ambience of Palm Beach, so I very much hope you will reject this proposal.

Thank you,
Gene Bernstein
100 Sunrise Avenue-#223

Received via email on 7.18.23:
Dear Ms. Fabrizi,

I am a resident of 100 Sunrise Avenue, #509.

I implore you not to approve the Paramount proposal.

This project will destroy the look and culture of a beautiful, unique, corner of Palm Beach.

If approved, we will probably move out to another community in the area. This is how intense our feelings are about this.

Elliott S. Kanbar

Received via email on 7.18.23:
To Sue Patterson, Chair of the Landmarks Preservation Commission,

Re: Objection to the revised application for 139 N County Road, the Paramount Theater Project : COA-23-003; Zon-23-020

My wife and I are residents of the Sun and Surf Condominiums at 130 Sunrise Avenue directly behind the Paramount. I am also the Vice President of our Association. I have reviewed attorney John Eubanks comments to you and agree.

The Paramount Theater is on the National Historic Registry and is an iconic Joseph Urban building. It is part of the charm of Palm Beach. Its presence distinguishes our part of town . The plans that are submitted to you only have de minimus differences from the plans that were presented in May to the Town Council . The Council members as you know were unanimous in not approving their design and asked them to come up with a new design which would be less massive and not overtake the Paramount Theater itself. The four ,three story town homes on the present parking lot overwhelm the historic Theater building. The renderings being presented to the LPC show how insignificant the Theater Building becomes . It looks like another large commercial development on the Island.

I am in favor of the Paramount to be renovated and saved for our island . It is in need of repairs . The owners ,however, appears to be more interested in an extremely profitable development . They need to scale down the development of the parking lot to allow the Paramount Theater to be seen.

I assume the LPC's role is only for how this project fits into the architecture of Palm Beach . I do however also have issues with the traffic and parking it will create. They plan to have in the Theater building a private club with several hundred members and also a function space that holds several hundred people . This creates over 400 people needing to find parking at the site . They are also asking for over 20 variances , many of which aren't to bring the Paramount up to code but for the rest of their development such as height restriction for the four town homes.

I request that you reject this proposal and recommend they come up with a design that allows the Historic Paramount to keep its dignity and presence in Palm Beach.

Thank you and your Committee members for preserving the special character of Palm Beach

Robert Grinberg
Sun and Surf
130 Sunrise Ave Unt 406
Palm Beach

Received via email on 4.26.23:
I am writing to voice my objection to the proposed development of the Paramount Building. This is a plan that would be an overbuilt use of the property. It also contains venues within that will cause an increase in the traffic for County Road and Sunrise streets which are already extremely congested most of the time. For everyone who lives nearby and in the North end, County Road is our only street of egress. Adding to the congestion is a disaster waiting to happen. For all the talk of the Council about trying to improve our traffic conditions and overbuilding our small island, I am surprised the project has gotten this far.

Thank you for your consideration.

Penny and Harold Blumenstein
650 North County Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480

Received via email on 4.29.23:
I live on the north end and object to the huge Paramount project.
Nancy Carter

Received via email on 5.2.23:
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing on behalf of Robert and Dana Kraft to express our strong objection to the proposed Paramount Redevelopment project. As concerned residents, we believe that the proposed development will have several negative impacts on the community, and we urge you to reject the proposal.
Firstly, the proposed development will detract from the prominence of the Paramount Building, which is an important landmark in our town. The proposed development overwhelms and diminishes the existing Paramount Building, and the increased height and intensity are disproportionate to the Paramount building. Moreover, the developer is seeking variances to build on every conceivable inch of the development, including zero setbacks, no greenspace, increased floor area, and multi-level underground parking. It is clear that the developer is looking to maximize profits, not develop in harmony and balance with the existing Paramount Theater.
Furthermore, the impacts from the private club, restaurants, and special events are also worrisome. The developer is proposing a private club within the renovated Paramount theater building with an initial membership of 225 members and a 250-person capacity public event space. We have not been provided with clear information on whether the developer plans to add additional members to the private club in the future and how many additional members they plan to add. Our understanding is that the private club will host various private events throughout the year, which raises concerns about traffic and parking issues. The developer is proposing two restaurants, and we are not provided with information on where employees will park, how many private club and restaurant employees there will be, and what hours they will be
coming and going.
The traffic impacts resulting from this development are also a cause for concern. Traffic and congestion in Palm Beach are already beyond capacity, and more time is needed to study the traffic impacts resulting from this development. Increasing parking from 46 to 127 spaces will result in more vehicle congestion entering and exiting the property. Moreover, we are concerned with traffic backup entering on Sunrise while valet maneuvers proposed complex tandem and stacking system to park and retrieve cars. Traffic backup exiting on Sunset is also a cause for concern, as this is a narrow street. With additional traffic buildup on Sunset from vehicles exiting, this will lead to chaos and safety issues.
The proposed parking solutions are inadequate. The developer has proposed two-floor underground parking with both tandem and stacking parking, which will be limited to valet parking only. The developer claims that valet parking will ensure that there is no excess traffic stacking onto adjacent streets. However, people are not going to want to valet park their cars because of the price to valet and the inconvenience of having to wait for the valet to retrieve their tandem and/or stacked parked cars. This will result in people avoiding valet parking and parking on the street, creating additional congestion, safety issues, and impacts on the neighboring properties.
Lastly, the safety issues with the construction of underground parking cannot be ignored. The construction of an underground garage poses structural and safety issues, and a geologic study is needed before approving underground parking. Excavation for underground parking could compromise the structural integrity of the surrounding buildings, including the landmarked Paramount Theater.
To conclude, we urge you to reject the proposed Paramount Redevelopment project. The proposed development will have several negative impacts on the community, and the developer is looking to maximize profits at the expense of the community. We need
development that is in harmony and balance with the existing Paramount Theater, and this proposal does not meet that criteria.

Thank you,

Austin Northup
Assistant Site Manager, The Kraft Group

Received via email on 5.18.23:
I have been a visitor to 100 Sunrise Avenue since 1978, and an owner there since I inherited my parents’ apartment in 2002. I have seen this beautiful neighborhood become more and more crowded every year, until it has finally reached the point of being unpleasant, if not downright dangerous.

It should not take 20 minutes to travel one block! This is not Times Square at rush hour. The lights are not coordinated, there is no police support, just every man/woman for themselves. And now you want to allow more construction to add to the already impossible situation.

I will not repeat all the talking points that I am sure you have already heard ad nauseam. One point that I have not read —and please forgive me if I repeat what you have already heard—is that access to the bridge—and therefore the nearest hospital—is close to impossible. I wouldn’t want to be in an ambulance waiting for traffic to clear. Perhaps you should put in a helicopter pad if you can’t do anything about the traffic on the island?

I am grateful for your time and attention. I hope you will keep this very important issue foremost in your mind.

Sincerely,

Ellen Gelboim
100 Sunrise Ave., apt. 315

Received via email on 5.30.23:
Dear President, Members of Town Council and Mayor Moore,

This is a letter of deep concern and disapproval in regards to the project proposed at the landmarked Paramount site including three restaurants to which the Town already said NO MORE. Again, another developer wanting to build more condos when we all agreed NO MORE. Another project requesting a ridiculous number of variances (twenty) and six special exceptions that will drastically impact the town particularly from the post office to the fire department will be affected. That is one of the two busiest intersections in town; you have both Sun and Surf buildings, Green’s Pharmacy, PB Synagogue, St. Edwards Church, the PB Hotel, the bank, Trevini, Publix Market and all the shops on the backside of Poinciana Way which are actually on Sunset Avenue. The firehouse is just down the way and it would affect their response time in emergencies. This project is overzealous, enormous and unwanted.

Residents are so frustrated that Town Council is not enforcing what is best for our town and that they would even consider this outrageous proposal! HOW DID THIS EVER GET THIS FAR? We don’t need any more! We are losing precious greenspace, when my husband built his projects on Worth Avenue, he donated two parks and an entire parking lot; this project is all cement and no one is giving anything. Granted the Paramount needs to be re-done, but we do not have to lose the greenspace and much needed parking.

The town already has too much going on, the traffic alone which hasn’t been straighted out even with the traffic plan that was given to the town and the town has not done anything about it yet. You can’t even get out of town at 3pm as is the traffic to cross the bridge lines all the way back up to Temple Emanu-El on County Road which is way past Green’s Pharmacy. Not to mention only having underground parking. Developers are submitting these plans during summer when most residents are out of town; we cannot protect our town if we are not here; the developers know this and take advantage of it. Wayne Bregman knows this too.

We are so disappointed and discouraged in how things are going in our town! Town Council is supposed to be helping the town people we voted for you to help us not to go against us. This is an insanely large project which is totally over the top. Town Council members must live up to their agreement of supporting the town residents. Just because someone proposes an outrageous plan doesn’t mean that it needs to be approved; remember the magic word for and it is called “NO”.

Sincerely,

Joanie M. Goodman
911 North Ocean Blvd., Palm Beach, FL 33480

Received via email on 6.8.23:
I am writing to express my deep concerns about the proposed Paramount project. The reasons people create homes in Palm Beach are simple: this is a wonderfully beautiful, accessible and refreshing environment. It is obvious that if the Paramount project goes forward, that will change for many people who live in this community.

Even now, one of the few complaints one hears about Palm Beach is the automobile traffic. That is understandable. The corner where the Paramount stands is a painful example. The traffic lights are set to permit constant automobile traffic. Every four minutes, pedestrians get a brief green light —about 20 seconds— to cross the street—with traffic still permitted to make turns. The result: at the corner, we peer up and down the street, and if it seems to be clear of traffic, we hurry across against the light. That is already a less-than-safe way to enjoy a walk in this beautiful town.

How much will that be compounded by the proposed Paramount project? The project cannot be successful without an enormous increase in traffic—which the entrepreneurs will understandably work to attract.

I hope that those in a position to do so will reject the Paramount Theater proposal.

Burt Manning

Received via eComment on 6.13.23:
I am a resident and property owner on the 100 block of Sunset Ave. One of my concerns with proposed development is that it will exasperate the current traffic issues on Sunset , Sunrise and North County. As shown below even in May it is difficult to exit Sunset ave. Some of this may be the unintended consequence of the the recent traffic pattern change restricting left turns on Bradley from Sunset. During the season North county is backed up all afternoon and early evening.
The current plan for the Paramount calls for a 250 seat theater , a restaurant , a private club, 100 outdoor dining seats and increasing parking from 46 to 127 spaces.
The area currently has significant retail space, Publix, 10 restaurants ( listed below) within 1.5 blocks of the development any addition may only increase density and traffic congestion .
PB Catch, Echo, Almond, Greens, Flagler Steak house, Cucina, Field of Greens Henry’s Lola 41 and Trevini. The area also is densely residential with large buildings including the Sun and Surf and the Leveritt house. The ability of emergency vehicles access the area needs to be taken into consideration .
I hope my information and input is useful , please pass it on to the appropriate involved decision makers.
Vincent T. Cloud
146 Sunset Ave

Received via email on 7.17.23:
Dear Commissioners of Landmark Preservation:

I have been a resident in Palm Beach for 50 years, and at my current Everglade Avenue location since 1988. Recently I was made aware that there are a few conflicting opinions and concerns regarding the renovation of the Paramount Building.

As someone who has lived through many other extensive renovation projects in my neighborhood and surrounding area, I think any initial inconveniences or adjustments to traffic patterns & parking will be worth the overall outcome. I have had the privilege of seeing many wonderful improvements over the years… most recently all along Royal Poinciana Way!

Because of this, I can say with confidence that I believe the proposed plans for the Paramount Theater renovation project will transform this once-loved town treasure into a thriving destination spot for Palm Beach residents and visitors alike. So, I wholeheartedly am in favor of this exciting endeavor!

Kindest Regards,

Ali DiNovo
225 Everglade Avenue Villa #4
Palm Beach, FL 33480

Received via email on 6.29.23:
Dear Ms Fabrizi,

My wife and I reside at 100 Sunrise Ave. My parents moved to Palm Beach in 1969. We have operated a retail business on Worth Avenue for over fifty years.

While we fully understand the desire to develop property in PB, more crucial is the need to protect the integrity of the island. As such, we urge you to restrict overdevelopment of this area and preserve the character and charm of the beautiful Paramount property. Limit the use and traffic congestion, which is bad enough in this particular area of the island. Developers should have the right to develop but not the right to overdevelop at the expense of others.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Peggy and Dudley Richter

Sent from my iPhone

Received via email 7.6.23:
Dear Chairwoman Patterson and Landmarks Commission,


Thank you for your work in protecting and preserving our great landmark properties in Palm Beach.

Our wonderful architectural heritage keeps Palm Beach the place that so many of us cherish.
The historic Paramount theater comes before your board for approval on July 19th.
As a neighbor and resident of Palm beach I want to lend my full support to the Historic Restoration of this critically important Landmarked property.

I am most pleased to finally see this deteriorating historic property returned to its former grandeur and the necessitated restoration carried out in the hands of local ownership.
The new construction of four residences, beautifully designed, will enhance the streetscape along North County Road and Sunset and Sunrise Avenues while protecting the neighborhood’s property values.

Please approve this important restoration effort for the benefit of the residents of Palm beach.

Yours sincerely,

Tommy Hilfiger
Founder and Principal Designer

Received via email on 7.10.23:
Dear Council and Commission Members,

I have been a resident of Palm Beach for 17 years and had an office in the Paramount Building (“Paramount”) for 12 years. After the Paramount was most recently sold, I anticipated that the new owner would be doing extensive renovations, and I decided to move rather than be subjected to the noise and dust that would ensue. In my judgment, while the Paramount had an incredibly illustrious past, it required major top to bottom reconstruction. I believe the Town was fortunate that this most important edifice was purchased by Lester Woehner, a gentleman who recognizes the sensitivity and architectural excellence that must be brought to bear in the Paramount’s restoration and development.

Also, as the immediate past President of Palm Beach Synagogue, which is across the street from the Paramount, I am of course concerned that that the Paramount site be developed to the highest standard of aesthetic design.

Having reviewed the proposed plans for the Paramount’s redevelopment, and after having discussed them with Lester Woehner, I believe the proposed plans for the Paramount and the limited residential plans would meaningfully enhance the streetscape. Having Robert Stern as the architect is a real plus. I worked closely with him when he designed a building at Princeton for which I was the major benefactor, and it wasn’t a WOW but rather it looked as if it always was meant for the site.

Lester Woehner is a remarkable man. His businesses and he are characterized by a “spirit of excellence”, and he is desirous of the Paramount development being an architectural gem in a very important area of our town. I urge that there be a “spirit of cooperation” among Lester Woehner, the Landmarks Commission, and the Town Council so that the Paramount’s restoration
can proceed apace and result in a new/old architectural gem in Palm Beach.

Sincerely,

Michael J. Scharf
225 Dunbar Road
Palm Beach, FL 33480

Received via email 7.11.23:
Sara & Jim McCann
217 Bahama Lane, Palm Beach, Florida 33480
July 7, 2023
Dear Landmarks Commission,
As 30 plus year residents of the Town of Palm Beach, my wife Sara and I write to
you today in support of the restoration project of the historic Paramount theatre.
This iconic building is in dire need of restoration. The local ownership group
consisting of Palm Beach residents who cherish this Town is eminently qualified to
undergo a thoughƞul and complete restoration.
The Commission has a unique opportunity to see this project through, led by the
world-class design team of Robert A. M. Stern Architects, a fine historical
preservationist and contextual architect.
The addition of 4 townhomes also designed by Robert A.M. Stern on the surface
parking lot to the south, will not only help defray some of the costs of the
restoration, but will beautify the neighborhood. Included in this plan is ample
underground parking which will create abundant parking, serviced by valets, with
no further stress to the on-street parking.
We urge the Landmarks Commission to pass this proposal for this unique
restoration of a treasured landmark. Denying only causes further decay of an
already eroding landmark. Let’s return the Paramount to its former glory for the
benefit of the Town’s residents.
Thank you for your consideration,
Sara & Jim McCann
217 Bahama Lane
Palm Beach, FL 33480

Received via email 7.11.23:
Dear Landmark Commissioner,

Thank you for your work in protecting and preserving our great landmark
properties in Palm Beach. Our wonderful architectural heritage keeps Palm Beach the place that so many of us cherish as our home and brings many to our Island to appreciate her beauty. One of our jewels is the historic Paramount theater which comes before your board for approval on July 19th, 2023.

As a neighbor and resident of Palm beach I want to lend my full support to the Historic Restoration of this critically important Landmarked property. I am most pleased to finally see this deteriorating historic property returned to its former grandeur and the necessitated restoration carried out in the hands of local ownership. The new construction of four residences, beautifully designed, will enhance the streetscape along North County Road, Sunset and Sunrise Avenues while protecting the neighborhood’s property values and beauty.

I am asking that you please approve this important restoration effort for the benefit of our Island and all it’s residents.

Sincerely,

Vera Alfieri
218 Miraflores Drive
Palm Beach, Florida

Received via email on 7.11.23:
I am writing to you in full support of the restoration of the paramount theater.
The acclaimed architect Robert Stern has designed a wonderful renovation of this iconic building.
It is such a gift to palm beach and one of the most exciting( if not the most exciting project) to come our way in decades.
It would be a shame to let a building of this magnitude fall further toward a state of disrepair. I think we are incredibly lucky to have such a talented design team involved in this project.
The town houses have been reduced in scale and I think complement the theater and will enhance the neighborhood.
There is adequate parking on site so as not to require a lot of street parking.
The project will bring glamour and cultural benefits to the residents of palm beach. It will be a tremendous asset to our town.
Thank you to all of you for the work you do in keeping Palm Beach the most wonderful town to live in.
Respectfully yours, Lynne Wheat

Received via email on 7.14.23:
Dear Bridget;

I hope you are having a nice summer. Thank you for all you do to protect our landmarked properties.

I am writing to you regarding the Paramount Building. As a matter of background, Linda and I have long admired the beautiful architecture of the historic Paramount. Having known the previous owner, Pastor Dwight Stevens, we learned about the iconic history of the Paramount and the past positive impact to the culture of Palm Beach. We have been hoping and praying that someone would take on the herculean task of restoring the property. It is in dire need of restoration to prevent any further deterioration.

I know that Lester Werner has pulled together an exemplary team to tackle this project, led by Robert Stern, an architect with a focus on historic preservation. He has presented a unique opportunity to the town to bring the Paramount back to grandeur with a best-in-class design team. Moreover, it is a huge benefit to the community to have local ownership, who respects and values the unique Palm Beach culture. I am totally convinced that this is a labor of love for Lester; an opportunity to maintain and enhance this historical property for the benefit of all our residents. Lester Woerner has a history of positive community engagement in the town, and I am convinced no developer would have designed the Paramount with community benefit being the highest priority.

The restoration of the Paramount will be a significant enhancement to the neighborhood and the entire town. Based upon my understanding of the revised plans, the new construction of four residences, beautifully designed, will enhance the streetscape along North County Road and Sunset and Sunrise Avenues while protecting the neighborhood’s property values. I also understand that the plan has an abundance of parking to avoid taking town parking spaces and includes valet service to further maximize the efficiency of flow of traffic and parking.

Linda and I ask the Landmarks Committee to approve the important restoration of the Paramount for the benefit of all Palm Beach residents. Thank you for your consideration.

Please give Tim our best wishes.

Best personal regards,
Alfred P. Aldridge III
2295 South Ocean Blvd.
Apartment 701
Palm Beach, FL 33480

Received via email on 7.14.23:
Dear Chairman Patterson and Landmarks Preservation Commissioners:

I write you today to express my support for the restoration of the Paramount Theatre.
I have very fond memories of going to the theatre as a child and consider it an irreplaceable landmark in Palm Beach. The design team has done an excellent job in researching the buildings history and I am pleased to see that their plans will restore the theatre to its original grandeur.

As a member of the Preservation Foundation’s Executive Committee, I know that the Foundation’s staff has been working with the design team for many months to achieve an infill design for the theatre’s parking lot that is historically sensitive and appropriate for the neighborhood. I encourage their continued collaboration and defer to the Foundation’s position on the townhouses.

Sincerely,

Pauline Pitt

Received via email on 7.15.23:
I am writing to urge against the current proposal for the expansion of the Paramount property. My objections relate to the effect of the proposed restaurant, club and entertainment venues ( as well as to the underground parking facility to service these venues ) on the neighborhood traffic and parking problems already existing.
Sunset Ave is a narrow two-way street with heavy truck and car traffic servicing Publix and an already restricted traffic pattern. Because of very heavy north/south traffic in both directions, westbound vehicles are prohibited from making a right turn on County Rd or a left turn at Bradley Place. The north/south traffic flow on County Rd makes it difficult to cross or turn onto County Rd, often requiring 2 or 3 traffic light cycles to execute. Pedestrians and cyclists are also hampered in navigating the crosswalks at this corner. During rush hour access to the bridge via Royal Poinciana is also difficult.
Pouring additional traffic onto Sunset Ave from a Paramount garage would significantly worsen this already difficult situation. For example, serious consequences could result if a traffic jam resulted in an emergency vehicle being unable to enter or leave Sunset Ave.
Please consider these potential problems in assessing the current Paramount proposal.
Stephen and Madeline Anbinder
120 Sunset Ave
3D

Received via email on 7.15.23:
To Town of Palm Beach Council:
My name is David Blue, and my wife and I are year around residences of Palm Beach living at 150 Canterbury Lane.
We have lived in Palm Beach for approximately15 years and feel blessed to be here.
We are acutely concerned about the proposed Paramount Redevelopment.
Since moving to Palm Beach, we have noticed that there is dramatically more traffic in the area between Royal Poinciana and Wells Road especially during the rush hours and evenings. The worse congestion is at the two intersections of Sunrise, Sunset and North County Road.
It appears to us that those two areas are absolutely already beyond their designed capacity.
We cannot comprehend the traffic challenges that will occur in these two intersections especially if the Paramount building has an event withs 225 to 250 people not including traffic from the proposed public restaurant.
Please consider a traffic study during the Winter months that would not only count the vehicles in a 24 hour period, but also would project the additional vehicles that would be at these two intersections if the proposed Paramount Redevelopment is allowed to occur.
Thank you very much for considering my suggestions and concerns.
David Blue

Received via email on 7.17.23:
To The Mayor, Town Council Members, and Landmarks Preservation Commission Members;

As a Florida resident and longtime Palm Beach home owner, I am writing yet another letter to the Mayor, Town Council Members, and the Landmarks Preservation Commission, in the hopes that those members who will have the final say in the Paramount Project will properly assess this Pandora’s Box of a development project.

Like many Palm Beach residents, my husband and I are away for the summer hurricane season, not due to return until late autumn. While I am diligently working to stay apprised of the project, most of the absentee owners are completely unaware of the progress being made by Mr. Woerner in the advancement of his plans. This is precisely what the developers are hoping for, counting on an “out-of-sight, out-of-mind” scenario in which they can proceed unchallenged and evade the level of scrutiny that is absolutely necessary for a project of this magnitude and intensification. I fervently agree with the Town Council Members and Residents who have suggested that for a level playing field and fairness to all, any important meetings should only take place when most residents are in Palm Beach and can attend the meetings. Be that as it may, there is a meeting scheduled for July 19th. I know I speak for many residents that we are very concerned that the modest changes Landmarks have requested are grossly inadequate.

In that regard, I am asking if an independent, detailed traffic study, commissioned by the town, not the developer, reflecting current use, use during construction (minimum 3 years), and use after the massive project is complete, has been conducted and submitted for review? If it has, I request that a copy be posted on your website to allow all property owners to compare it side-by-side with the study provided by the developer. This is critical information for residents, as well as the planned retail stores, offices, private club and restaurants who will all be crammed into the small available grid. There have already been issues with the valet parking for the Carriage House and many concerns regarding valeting at The Vineta, both of which are significantly smaller projects than the proposed Paramount development. As everyone who lives here, works here, or just visits, now knows, traffic has become a constant issue of grid-lock, sometimes paralyzing the area for a 1/2 mile in every direction. A development of the size proposed would mean total, irreversible chaos, and will pose potentially tragic life-and-death situations.

Of equal, and possibly greater importance, has a detailed, independent geologic study covering ground composition, current site conditions, conditions of the site during construction, and probable conditions of the site after construction is completed, been ordered by the town? Has a similar study been demanded and conducted by the developer for comparison? If they have, I request that copies of both also be posted on your website to allow all concerned to compare the Town’s study with the one provided by the developer for a side-by-side evaluation. Given the difficulties encountered by the Frisbies when excavating for a smaller garage as part of their development just down the block on Sunset Avenue, and taking into consideration the very recent, tragic Surfside collapse, as well as the underground garage problems at Una Residences in Miami, not to mention the geologic structure of the island in general, this is an absolutely necessary step to take before any shovel hits the ground. Any lack of diligence or signs of negligence which could endanger people and existing structures would leave the town vulnerable to tremendous liabilities.

At a previous meeting, when it was, at last, my turn to speak, I asked the architect who had just presented the residential part of the project a simple question of where the mechanicals were to be located. As our apartment is directly over the back of the Paramount and about 30 other apartments at the Sun and Surf are directly facing the Paramount, the noise level is of great concern. He punted the question to one of his minions, who seemed surprised by both the question and the architect's uncomfortable response. They ultimately answered that there would be one generator in the back of the building, and the air conditioning on the roof of the Paramount as it is now. I asked about the residences and they said they didn’t know yet. However, I did get to see a site plan that had been submitted almost a year before the meeting, and the placement of all the mechanicals was quite clear. They show there will be 2 generators of up to 100kW, the maximum size before needing an enclosure. One will be for the Paramount, the other for the residences. It also clearly shows placements of all the HVAC equipment, kitchen exhausts, etc., all of which produce noise and odors. This feigning not knowing something that clearly should be known by them, and indeed was known by them, has left me with an increasing lack of trust in the honesty and sincerity of the developers.

I have attended several Landmarks Preservation Commission meetings where there were hours-long discussions of the minutiae of requests for very insignificant architectural details of landmark buildings and private residences, and how the planned changes might impact the area and neighboring properties. It is unthinkable that a project of this massive size and undertaking may not be reviewed with equal scrutiny. With all of the “special exemptions” and “variances” that have been bestowed on many of the projects presented to the Town, surely there must not be allowed any exemption from any laws or precedents this developer is exploiting in order to fast-track this project through the Landmarks Commission. Both Landmarks and Town Council must scrutinize every element of this watershed project to determine if they merit modification, enhancement, or outright denial.

Magicians fool the public by making them focus on an interesting object while they are skillfully enabling their “trick” out of eyesight. Woerner has performed a most artful dodge by dangling the “restoration” object in the focus of Landmarks, who are dazzled by the prospect of having the Paramount “restored.” Meanwhile, out of sight, the project to “repurpose” the Paramount into a cash cow for the developer, is moving full steam ahead. Speaking for the residents in Palm Beach, I am sincerely hoping that the town council will not be fooled by this sleight-of-hand maneuver which will enhance only the Woerner group at the expense of the residents, your constituency, who have elected the town officials expecting that their interests, real estate values, and quality of life will be protected by those very officials. The project as proposed is in no way a restoration of the use of the building as it was originally intended and used, and, despite its claims, in no way does it honor Joseph Urban the architect, or the history and the influence of the Paramount Theater on the fledgling film industry in America. The Paramount became an iconic cultural meeting place, where the glitterati and influencers of its day met to share ideas, putting Palm Beach “on the map.” If allowed to move forward, the Paramount project will be a perfect example of unnecessary intensification of use, just another developers folly totally overshadowed by ill conceived residences and unnecessarily excessive commercial spaces that will destroy the very nature of the Paramount, and sadly, also the fabric of Palm Beach that has been lovingly protected and enjoyed for decades.

Please do not let that happen!

Elaine Bedell Hirsch
130 Sunrise Ave, PH 1 & 2
Palm Beach, FL 33480

Received via email on 7.17.23:
As a resident of Leverett House, I am extremely concerned about the plans to develop the Paramount. It is an important town landmark and should be enhanced by its surroundings not overwhelmed by them.

TRAFFIC IS A PROBLEM NOW‼️ It is nearly impossible to get out of the ocean block of Sunset Avenue most of the day. It is also congested with landscaping trucks, mail trucks, garbage trucks, construction trucks and residents cars.

A private club, a restaurant and/or an event space would cause more traffic as well as be disruptive to the neighborhood. It would bring more cars, more trucks and more noise, everything we do not want or need.

Palm Beach is a town where “town serving” has always been an important concept. Hopefully, we can keep it that way.

Abby Ruttenberg
120 Sunset Ave Apt 2E
PB FL 33480

Received via email on 7.17.23:
Dear Chairman Patterson and Landmarks Preservation Commission members,
The Town Council has changed the approval process for large commercial development applications which now are FIRST reviewed by Council before proceeding to ARCOM or LPC. We urge you to follow the new procedure and send the entire Paramount Theatre property application to the Council for zoning review and determination as to the legality of the 27 variances,7 special exceptions, and site plan review being sought by Mr. Woerner. It is quite stunning to see an application with so many variances seeking zoning relief from our code and comprehensive plan.
What is proposed by the applicant is so intertwined and conjoined that it is impossible to separate your area of Landmark preservation from the Council’s responsibilities regarding zoning relief. Let the Council do its job with zoning so that your commission will be able to focus on the Landmark Preservation aspects when a more reasonable scale and legal application comes to you. If you do not forward this application to Council , I believe you are a quasi-judicial body and you will have to make motions regarding the overall design of the project and the variances. Surely, LPC would not want to make rulings that will result in lawsuits by the neighboring property owners and their lawyers who clearly outlined the egregious deficiencies of this application at your last meeting.

Thank you for your time and hard work,

Sincerely,
Anne and Charlie Pepper
333 Seaspray Ave

Received via email on 7.17.23:
Good Day Ms. Paterson and Landmarks Preservation on Commissioners ("LPC"):

I’m writing as a concerned property owner of the 130 Sun And Surf Condo Association. After reviewing the plan revisions from the earlier submission it seems very little has been modified to scale back the size and magnitude of the proposed project. Besides the legal issues that are likely the responsibility of Town Council. The big problem is the proposed size of the project for such a small footprint of real estate. Certainly there should be some limitations, so the neighborhood and community retain a village/town like
character. We shouldn’t transform the block into an intense mixed commercial use without addressing aesthetic and commercial impacts to area homeowners and other establishments. Please request the developer make meaningful size reductions in the plans and specifications.

Very truly yours,

Matthew B Allen
130 Sunrise Ave

Received via email 7.17.23:
I am a resident and owner of property within the immediate area of the above-proposed development. I have written before in opposition to the project as proposed, focusing on specific landmark-related issues.

This submission again expresses my opposition to Landmarks proceeding on the substance of the application, but it focuses on procedure. I am an attorney and have both filed and opposed variance requests in the past.

Briefly, the Commission must return the entire application to Town Council and follow procedures now in place. Only the Council has the authority to rule on zoning variance applications and to be successful, those applications must meet clear and specific criteria in order to be granted consistent with the law.

Only after the Council reviews the applications for zoning variances may the application proceed to ARCOM or Landmarks. Residents supported this approach.

Much of the proposed plan cannot be built under standards for grant of a variance or special exception request, and due to non-compliance with the comprehensive plan. This is not yet the time for discussion of architectural merits of the proposed project. At this stage, the Council has the sole jurisdiction–and responsibility–to determine whether any of these exceptions and variances can be legally justified before the application can go forward. To fail to ensure that the Council properly exercises its authority places the Town and its tax-paying residents at fiscal and other risk of costly legal challenge.

I therefore urge the Commission to direct the application to the Council.

Respectfully,

Helen Starr
170 North Ocean

Received via email 6.16.23:
Dear Landmarks Preservation Commissioners,

I am writing to express my support for the Paramount Theater renovation project.

As a resident of the 100 block of Sunrise, I welcome the improvements, additional parking, retail and residential building that are proposed. The project will transform the Paramount Theater while maintaining the building's character and historical elements.

The current state of the Paramount does not do justice to one of Palm Beach's architectural and historical treasures. If the proposed project is approved, it will breathe life into what is now a “dead” corner, with most of the building being vacant. The addition of sorely needed parking, especially valet, will bring more patrons that will allow viable businesses to operate there. It will also help alleviate the parking congestion in the nearby area. The entire neighborhood surrounding the Paramount would benefit from the project. Property values would increase.

I don't have any concerns about the temporary inconveniences that I may encounter during the construction and renovation. The end result will be the reward. The Frisbee project on Royal Poinciana Way and Sunset was an incredible transformation, and I feel the Paramount project is a continuation to update and beautify the area, while preserving an important historical building.

Kindest Regards,

Karen Fish
139 Sunrise Avenue Unit 306
Palm Beach, FL 33480

Received via email 6.30.23:
As an owner of a condo at 100 Sunrise Avenue (Sun & Surf) I am writing to express my strenuous objection to the proposal by the owner of the Paramount project. Developers have a right to upgrade property but this proposal far exceeds any reasonable improvements, especially since the Paramount is such a landmark building.

The proposal would totally overwhelm the lovely corner property via zero setbacks, no green space, and height exceeding the current building-which fits so charmingly into the neighborhood.

And it would overwhelm the neighborhood by establishing a club with 225 members (and perhaps more down the road), adding 2 restaurants, and hosting private events-all of which will bring noise and traffic to an area already overburdened with it. Increasing parking from 46 to 127 spots, plus food and special event deliveries, tell you all you need to know about what a nightmare this would become.

Finally, what will building an underground garage do to the stability of surrounding structures, as well as the congestion?

In short, seeking 20 variances is far out of line with the well protected character and ambience of Palm Beach, so I very much hope you will reject this proposal.

Thank you,
Gene Bernstein
100 Sunrise Avenue-#223

Received via email on 4.19.23:
Mayor and Member of Council,

This letter is be written in objection to the redevelopment of the Paramount Theater Property. My primary concerns relate to the traffic congestion that the proposed plan would create and the scale of the development which is inconsistent with anything in our city.

The traffic arteries, as they current exist, simply cannot accommodate the expected increase in traffic and the streets cannot be expanded. Furthermore, the density of people, activities, and structure is totally out of character with anything in the city
I
I do not object to this property being re-designed and re-developed in a manner that Is consistant with other older properties that have faced a similar situation. I think that the solution is smaller scale with less activity.

Thank you,
Ronald Rosenfeld
110 Sunset Ave. Apt. 3A
Palm Beach, FL 33480

Received via email on 5.14.23:
I am a resident and property owner on the 100 block of Sunset Ave. One of my concerns with proposed development is that it will exasperate the current traffic issues on Sunset , Sunrise and North County. As shown below even in May it is difficult to exit Sunset ave. Some of this may be the unintended consequence of the the recent traffic pattern change restricting left turns on Bradley from Sunset. During the season North county is backed up all afternoon and early evening.
The current plan for the Paramount calls for a 250 seat theater , a restaurant , a private club, 100 outdoor dining seats and increasing parking from 46 to 127 spaces.
The area currently has significant retail space, Publix, 10 restaurants ( listed below) within 1.5 blocks of the development any addition may only increase density and traffic congestion .
PB Catch, Echo, Almond, Greens, Flagler Steak house, Cucina, Field of Greens Henry’s Lola 41 and Trevini. The area also is densely residential with large buildings including the Sun and Surf and the Leveritt house. The ability of emergency vehicles access the area needs to be taken into consideration .
I hope my information and input is useful , please pass it on to the appropriate involved decision makers.
Vincent T. Cloud

Received via email on 5.15.23:
To Whom It May Concern:

My name is Pnina Weisfisch and I have been an owner of, and permanent resident at, 280 North Ocean Boulevard in Palm Beach, Florida since 1990, a period of approximately 33 years. I am writing to express my strong opposition to ZON-23-020 (COA-23-003), the proposed approval of a special exception with site plan review for the renovation of the Paramount Theater and the construction of a new three­ story mixed-use development consisting of both retail and residential units.
The overdevelopment and expansion of retail and multi-family residential units in the Town of Palm Beach will likely have an adverse effect on existing residential property within the surrounding neighborhoods. The addition of the proposed retail and multi-family residential units is inconsistent with the charm and quaintness that initially attracted us to the Town of Palm Beach. As members of the community, we have a responsibility to preserve our community's architectural heritage and its landmarked properties, but the proposed development, which seems to require at least 20 separate variances, is inconsistent with our long-established architectural standards. Furthermore, given the Town of Palm Beach's small population and land area, even seemingly minor developments within a confined area will gradually lead to increases in population density, which in turn may lower our quality of life as a result of additional traffic and pedestrian hazards, among other things.
For the above reasons, I strongly urge you to deny the application. Thank you for your service to our community.
Sincerely,
Pnina Weisfisch
280 North Ocean Boulevard
Palm Beach, Florida 33480

Received via email on 7.17.23:
Dear Landmarks Commission:
The historic Paramount theater comes before your board for approval on July 19th.
As a neighbor near the Paramount and full-time resident of Palm Beach I want to lend my support to the Historic Restoration of this critically important Landmarked property. The Architect that has been hired for the restoration project, Robert AM Stern is arguably the greatest non-classical architect since Horace Trumbauer.

I’m most pleased to see this deteriorating historic property in the hands of a non-commercial developer and safely in the stewardship of a fellow resident who cares about the future of this landmark. We too often see non-residents, and their professional local consultants use the resources of the island to benefit themselves and others who are not stakeholders on the island. I believe Mr. Stern's proposed design will keep the island's European feel, address critical parking concerns and enhance the streetscape along North County Road, Sunset and Sunrise Avenues. Currently that corridor is used as a cut through for speeding contractors and landscapers. Due to this the storefronts are mostly empty and not inviting for foot traffic. I believe the ownership sincerely wants to change this while protecting and enhancing the walkability of this end of town. Please approve this important restoration effort for the benefit of the resident stakeholders of the Ocean Park section of Palm Beach.

All the best,
Frank F. Herz
258 Seminole Avenue
Palm Beach, Florida 33480

Received via email on 7.5.23:
Dear Landmarks Commission,
Thank you for your important work in protecting and preserving our great landmark properties in Palm Beach.

As a native of the island, I know that the wonderful architectural heritage of Palm Beach is one of the many amazing characteristics that so many of us cherish about our town.

The historic Paramount theater comes before your board for approval on July 19th. As a neighbor and lifelong resident of Palm Beach I want to lend my full support to the Historic Restoration of this critically important Landmarked property. Renown historic preservationist Robert AM Stern has been chosen to lead the world class design team in this unique opportunity to bring this deteriorating historic property back to its former grandeur.

I am especially pleased to see this necessary restoration carried out in the hands of a local ownership team who, with a history of community engagement, care about the betterment of Palm Bea ch.

The new construction of four beautifully designed residences will enhance the streetscape along North County Road and Sunset and Sunrise Avenues while protecting the neighborhood's property values. Designed with benefit of the community in mind, there will be an abundance of onsite parking to avoid using town parking spaces.

As you are aware, the Royal Poinciana Plaza was a rundown eyesore for many years, but its refurbishment has been a major addition to the lives of all residents, as well as huge financial success for Palm Beach, and I truly believe that saving the Paramount will have the same important results for our town.

Please approve this important restoration effort for the benefit of the residents of Palm beach.

Sincerely,
Jane B. Holzer
980 South Ocean Boulevard
Palm Beach, FL 33480

Received via email on 7.14.23:
Dear Landmarks Commission,

Thank you for your work in protecting and preserving our great landmark properties in Palm Beach.
Our wonderful architectural heritage keeps Palm Beach the place that so many of us cherish. The historic Paramount theater comes before your board for approval on July 19th.
As a neighbor and resident of Palm beach I want to lend my full support to the Historic
Restoration ofthis critically important Landmarked property.
I am most pleased to finally see this deteriorating historic property returned to Its former grandeur and the necessitated restoration carried out in the hands of local ownership.
The new construction of four residences, beautifully designed, will enhance the streetscape along North County Rqad and Sunset and Sunrise Avenues while protecting the neighborhood's property values.

Please approve this important restoration effort for the benefit of the residents of Palm beach.

Sincerely,
Winston D. Wren
228 Nightingale Trail
Palm Beach, FL 33480